From: David Hildenbrand Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 20:03:52 +0000 (+0200) Subject: KVM: s390: vsie: speed up VCPU irq delivery when handling vsie X-Git-Tag: v4.8-rc1~60^2~81^2~5 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=adbf16985c387851fd3454ca34893705dbde7f98;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-exynos.git KVM: s390: vsie: speed up VCPU irq delivery when handling vsie Whenever we want to wake up a VCPU (e.g. when injecting an IRQ), we have to kick it out of vsie, so the request will be handled faster. Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger --- diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h index 190ad63..946fc86 100644 --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h @@ -549,6 +549,8 @@ struct kvm_guestdbg_info_arch { struct kvm_vcpu_arch { struct kvm_s390_sie_block *sie_block; + /* if vsie is active, currently executed shadow sie control block */ + struct kvm_s390_sie_block *vsie_block; unsigned int host_acrs[NUM_ACRS]; struct fpu host_fpregs; struct kvm_s390_local_interrupt local_int; diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c index d72c4a8..ca19627 100644 --- a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c @@ -995,6 +995,11 @@ void kvm_s390_vcpu_wakeup(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) swake_up(&vcpu->wq); vcpu->stat.halt_wakeup++; } + /* + * The VCPU might not be sleeping but is executing the VSIE. Let's + * kick it, so it leaves the SIE to process the request. + */ + kvm_s390_vsie_kick(vcpu); } enum hrtimer_restart kvm_s390_idle_wakeup(struct hrtimer *timer) diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h index b137fba..ffbbdd28 100644 --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h @@ -254,6 +254,7 @@ int kvm_s390_handle_eb(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); /* implemented in vsie.c */ int kvm_s390_handle_vsie(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); +void kvm_s390_vsie_kick(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); void kvm_s390_vsie_gmap_notifier(struct gmap *gmap, unsigned long start, unsigned long end); void kvm_s390_vsie_init(struct kvm *kvm); diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c b/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c index 7482488..c8c8763 100644 --- a/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c @@ -838,6 +838,23 @@ static int acquire_gmap_shadow(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, } /* + * Register the shadow scb at the VCPU, e.g. for kicking out of vsie. + */ +static void register_shadow_scb(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, + struct vsie_page *vsie_page) +{ + WRITE_ONCE(vcpu->arch.vsie_block, &vsie_page->scb_s); +} + +/* + * Unregister a shadow scb from a VCPU. + */ +static void unregister_shadow_scb(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) +{ + WRITE_ONCE(vcpu->arch.vsie_block, NULL); +} + +/* * Run the vsie on a shadowed scb, managing the gmap shadow, handling * prefix pages and faults. * @@ -860,6 +877,7 @@ static int vsie_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vsie_page *vsie_page) rc = do_vsie_run(vcpu, vsie_page); gmap_enable(vcpu->arch.gmap); } + atomic_andnot(PROG_BLOCK_SIE, &scb_s->prog20); if (rc == -EAGAIN) rc = 0; @@ -1000,7 +1018,9 @@ int kvm_s390_handle_vsie(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) rc = pin_blocks(vcpu, vsie_page); if (rc) goto out_unshadow; + register_shadow_scb(vcpu, vsie_page); rc = vsie_run(vcpu, vsie_page); + unregister_shadow_scb(vcpu); unpin_blocks(vcpu, vsie_page); out_unshadow: unshadow_scb(vcpu, vsie_page); @@ -1039,3 +1059,18 @@ void kvm_s390_vsie_destroy(struct kvm *kvm) kvm->arch.vsie.page_count = 0; mutex_unlock(&kvm->arch.vsie.mutex); } + +void kvm_s390_vsie_kick(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) +{ + struct kvm_s390_sie_block *scb = READ_ONCE(vcpu->arch.vsie_block); + + /* + * Even if the VCPU lets go of the shadow sie block reference, it is + * still valid in the cache. So we can safely kick it. + */ + if (scb) { + atomic_or(PROG_BLOCK_SIE, &scb->prog20); + if (scb->prog0c & PROG_IN_SIE) + atomic_or(CPUSTAT_STOP_INT, &scb->cpuflags); + } +}