From: Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2022 15:14:36 +0000 (+0800)
Subject: libbpf: Return -ENODATA for missing btf section
X-Git-Tag: v6.6.7~3490^2~337^2
X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=acd3b7768048fe338248cdf43ccfbf8c084a6bc1;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-starfive.git

libbpf: Return -ENODATA for missing btf section

As discussed before, return -ENODATA (No data available) would be more
meaningful than ENOENT (No such file or directory).

Suggested-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221231151436.6541-1-changbin.du@gmail.com
---

diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c
index b032500..6484111 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c
@@ -1004,7 +1004,7 @@ static struct btf *btf_parse_elf(const char *path, struct btf *base_btf,
 
 	if (!btf_data) {
 		pr_warn("failed to find '%s' ELF section in %s\n", BTF_ELF_SEC, path);
-		err = -ENOENT;
+		err = -ENODATA;
 		goto done;
 	}
 	btf = btf_new(btf_data->d_buf, btf_data->d_size, base_btf);