From: Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@gcc.gnu.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 06:14:51 +0000 (+0200)
Subject: Handle AR_FULL vs. AR_FULL in dependency checking.
X-Git-Tag: upstream/12.2.0~15359
X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=abcde0a658e17dbbabcb396eaae5a3612e07d401;p=platform%2Fupstream%2Fgcc.git

Handle AR_FULL vs. AR_FULL in dependency checking.

Previously, handling of full vs. full references failed to take
AR_FULL vs. AR_FULL into account.  A change in dependency
checking in gcc 10 created a code path that could lead there;
with this patch, this is now correctly handled.

gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:

2020-06-23  Thomas Koenig  <tkoenig@gcc.gnu.org>

	PR fortran/95812
	* dependency.c (ref_same_as_full_array): Handle case of AR_FULL
	vs. AR_FULL.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

2020-06-23  Thomas Koenig  <tkoenig@gcc.gnu.org>

	PR fortran/95812
	* gfortran.dg/dependency_59.f90: New test.
---

diff --git a/gcc/fortran/dependency.c b/gcc/fortran/dependency.c
index f6c6840..7edd5d9 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/dependency.c
+++ b/gcc/fortran/dependency.c
@@ -2033,6 +2033,8 @@ ref_same_as_full_array (gfc_ref *full_ref, gfc_ref *ref)
     return false;
   if (ref->type != REF_ARRAY)
     return false;
+  if (ref->u.ar.type == AR_FULL)
+    return true;
   if (ref->u.ar.type != AR_SECTION)
     return false;
 
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/dependency_59.f90 b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/dependency_59.f90
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..90c6532
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/dependency_59.f90
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+! { dg-do compile }
+! PR 95812 - this caused an ICE.
+! Test case by Jakub Jelinek.
+
+module test
+contains
+  subroutine foo()
+    integer :: a(3)
+    a = 1
+    print *, matmul(1*reshape(a,(/3,1/)), reshape((/1,1,1/),(/1,3/)))
+  end subroutine foo
+  subroutine bar()
+    call foo()
+  end subroutine bar
+end module test