From: Josh Don <joshdon@google.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2020 22:52:08 +0000 (-0700)
Subject: sched/fair: Remove distribute_running from CFS bandwidth
X-Git-Tag: v5.10.7~2480^2~36
X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=ab93a4bc955b3980c699430bc0b633f0d8b607be;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-rpi.git

sched/fair: Remove distribute_running from CFS bandwidth

This is mostly a revert of commit:

  baa9be4ffb55 ("sched/fair: Fix throttle_list starvation with low CFS quota")

The primary use of distribute_running was to determine whether to add
throttled entities to the head or the tail of the throttled list. Now
that we always add to the tail, we can remove this field.

The other use of distribute_running is in the slack_timer, so that we
don't start a distribution while one is already running. However, even
in the event that this race occurs, it is fine to have two distributions
running (especially now that distribute grabs the cfs_b->lock to
determine remaining quota before assigning).

Signed-off-by: Josh Don <joshdon@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200410225208.109717-3-joshdon@google.com
---

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 0c13a41..3d6ce75 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -4931,14 +4931,12 @@ static int do_sched_cfs_period_timer(struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b, int overrun, u
 	/*
 	 * This check is repeated as we release cfs_b->lock while we unthrottle.
 	 */
-	while (throttled && cfs_b->runtime > 0 && !cfs_b->distribute_running) {
-		cfs_b->distribute_running = 1;
+	while (throttled && cfs_b->runtime > 0) {
 		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cfs_b->lock, flags);
 		/* we can't nest cfs_b->lock while distributing bandwidth */
 		distribute_cfs_runtime(cfs_b);
 		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&cfs_b->lock, flags);
 
-		cfs_b->distribute_running = 0;
 		throttled = !list_empty(&cfs_b->throttled_cfs_rq);
 	}
 
@@ -5052,10 +5050,6 @@ static void do_sched_cfs_slack_timer(struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b)
 	/* confirm we're still not at a refresh boundary */
 	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&cfs_b->lock, flags);
 	cfs_b->slack_started = false;
-	if (cfs_b->distribute_running) {
-		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cfs_b->lock, flags);
-		return;
-	}
 
 	if (runtime_refresh_within(cfs_b, min_bandwidth_expiration)) {
 		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cfs_b->lock, flags);
@@ -5065,9 +5059,6 @@ static void do_sched_cfs_slack_timer(struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b)
 	if (cfs_b->quota != RUNTIME_INF && cfs_b->runtime > slice)
 		runtime = cfs_b->runtime;
 
-	if (runtime)
-		cfs_b->distribute_running = 1;
-
 	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cfs_b->lock, flags);
 
 	if (!runtime)
@@ -5076,7 +5067,6 @@ static void do_sched_cfs_slack_timer(struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b)
 	distribute_cfs_runtime(cfs_b);
 
 	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&cfs_b->lock, flags);
-	cfs_b->distribute_running = 0;
 	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cfs_b->lock, flags);
 }
 
@@ -5218,7 +5208,6 @@ void init_cfs_bandwidth(struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b)
 	cfs_b->period_timer.function = sched_cfs_period_timer;
 	hrtimer_init(&cfs_b->slack_timer, CLOCK_MONOTONIC, HRTIMER_MODE_REL);
 	cfs_b->slack_timer.function = sched_cfs_slack_timer;
-	cfs_b->distribute_running = 0;
 	cfs_b->slack_started = false;
 }
 
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index db3a576..7198683 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -349,7 +349,6 @@ struct cfs_bandwidth {
 
 	u8			idle;
 	u8			period_active;
-	u8			distribute_running;
 	u8			slack_started;
 	struct hrtimer		period_timer;
 	struct hrtimer		slack_timer;