From: Tom de Vries Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 21:54:21 +0000 (+0200) Subject: [gdb/testsuite] Rewrite catch-follow-exec.exp using gdb_test X-Git-Tag: users/ARM/embedded-binutils-master-2018q4~365 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=a76dc3b7705c5c85efc00521ebfac49e80c3fedf;p=external%2Fbinutils.git [gdb/testsuite] Rewrite catch-follow-exec.exp using gdb_test The testcase catch-follow-exec.exp is written use gdb -batch in order to avoid a GDB SIGTTOU. After the commit of "Avoid GDB SIGTTOU on catch exec + set follow-exec-mode new (PR 23368)", that no longer is necessary. Rewrite the test using regular gdb_test commands. Tested with x86_64-linux. 2018-10-24 Tom de Vries * gdb.base/catch-follow-exec.exp: Rewrite using gdb_test. --- diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog b/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog index 99d1e85..bfcea61 100644 --- a/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog +++ b/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog @@ -1,5 +1,9 @@ 2018-10-24 Tom de Vries + * gdb.base/catch-follow-exec.exp: Rewrite using gdb_test. + +2018-10-24 Tom de Vries + * gdb.base/valgrind-db-attach.exp: Handle removed support for --db-attach in valgrind. diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/catch-follow-exec.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/catch-follow-exec.exp index c3c7c7e..5f7db25 100644 --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/catch-follow-exec.exp +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/catch-follow-exec.exp @@ -13,72 +13,35 @@ # You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License # along with this program. If not, see . -# Check whether finish respects the print pretty user setting when printing the -# function result. +# Test whether info prog crashes gdb at a catch point in follow-exec-mode new. standard_testfile -if { [target_info gdb_protocol] != "" } { - # Even though the feature under features being tested are supported by - # gdbserver, the way this test is written doesn't make it easy with a - # remote target. - unsupported "not native" - return -} - if { ![remote_file target exists /bin/ls] } { unsupported "no ls" return } -if { [build_executable "failed to prepare" $testfile $srcfile debug] == -1 } { - return -1 +if { [prepare_for_testing "failed to prepare" $testfile $srcfile debug] } { + return } proc catch_follow_exec { } { - global binfile - global gdb_spawn_id - - set test "catch-follow-exec" - - append FLAGS " \"$binfile\"" - append FLAGS " -batch" - append FLAGS " -ex \"catch exec\"" - append FLAGS " -ex \"set follow-exec-mode new\"" - append FLAGS " -ex \"run\"" - append FLAGS " -ex \"info prog\"" - - gdb_exit - if {[gdb_spawn_with_cmdline_opts "$FLAGS"] != 0} { - fail "spawn" - return + if { ![runto_main] } { + untested "could not run to main" + return -1 } - gdb_test_multiple "" "run til exit" { - "runtime error:" { - # Error in case of --enable-ubsan - fail "no runtime error" - } - eof { - set result [wait -i $gdb_spawn_id] - verbose $result + gdb_test "catch exec" \ + {Catchpoint [0-9]+ \(exec\)} - gdb_assert { [lindex $result 2] == 0 } + gdb_test_no_output "set follow-exec-mode new" - # We suspect this will be zero instead of one after fixing PR23368 - # - "gdb goes to into background when hitting exec catchpoint with - # follow-exec-mode new" - gdb_assert { [lindex $result 3] != 0 } + gdb_test "continue" \ + ".*hit Catchpoint.*" - # Error in case of --disable-ubsan, we get - # "CHILDKILLED SIGSEGV {segmentation violation}" as extra - # argument(s). - gdb_assert { [llength $result] == 4 } - } - - remote_close host - clear_gdb_spawn_id - } + gdb_test "info prog" \ + "No selected thread." } catch_follow_exec