From: Ian Lance Taylor Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 21:07:13 +0000 (+0000) Subject: re PR go/89321 (cross build with riscv64 gccgo compilation failed due to assert in... X-Git-Tag: upstream/12.2.0~26191 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=a6c723e202ebd5ae388ca04b7be5ff6fbe70439f;p=platform%2Fupstream%2Fgcc.git re PR go/89321 (cross build with riscv64 gccgo compilation failed due to assert in constructor_expression) PR go/89321 compiler: copy has_padding field from converted struct Test case is https://golang.org/cl/162617. Fixes https://gcc.gnu.org/PR89321 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/162618 From-SVN: r268904 --- diff --git a/gcc/go/gofrontend/MERGE b/gcc/go/gofrontend/MERGE index f74b5f8..ebf8cd5 100644 --- a/gcc/go/gofrontend/MERGE +++ b/gcc/go/gofrontend/MERGE @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -a487c86418488f6a17dab4f9945e2a5d495e3ddb +c2fc3b83d832725accd4fa5874a5b5ca02dd90dc The first line of this file holds the git revision number of the last merge done from the gofrontend repository. diff --git a/gcc/go/gofrontend/types.cc b/gcc/go/gofrontend/types.cc index e411456..9081af6 100644 --- a/gcc/go/gofrontend/types.cc +++ b/gcc/go/gofrontend/types.cc @@ -1003,6 +1003,16 @@ Type::get_backend(Gogo* gogo) ins.first->second.is_placeholder = false; } + // We set the has_padding field of a Struct_type when we convert + // to the backend type, so if we have multiple Struct_type's + // mapping to the same backend type we need to copy the + // has_padding field. FIXME: This is awkward. We shouldn't + // really change the type when setting the backend type, but + // there isn't any other good time to add the padding field. + if (ins.first->first->struct_type() != NULL + && ins.first->first->struct_type()->has_padding()) + this->struct_type()->set_has_padding(); + return ins.first->second.btype; }