From: Keith Busch Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2021 21:59:26 +0000 (-0700) Subject: mm/vmscan: Consider anonymous pages without swap X-Git-Tag: accepted/tizen/unified/20230118.172025~6477^2~33 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=a2a36488a61cefe3129295c6e75b3987b9d7fd13;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-rpi.git mm/vmscan: Consider anonymous pages without swap Reclaim anonymous pages if a migration path is available now that demotion provides a non-swap recourse for reclaiming anon pages. Note that this check is subtly different from the can_age_anon_pages() checks. This mechanism checks whether a specific page in a specific context can actually be reclaimed, given current swap space and cgroup limits. can_age_anon_pages() is a much simpler and more preliminary check which just says whether there is a possibility of future reclaim. [kbusch@kernel.org: v11] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210715055145.195411-8-ying.huang@intel.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210721063926.3024591-7-ying.huang@intel.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210715055145.195411-8-ying.huang@intel.com Cc: Keith Busch Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen Signed-off-by: "Huang, Ying" Reviewed-by: Yang Shi Reviewed-by: Zi Yan Cc: Michal Hocko Cc: Wei Xu Cc: David Rientjes Cc: Dan Williams Cc: David Hildenbrand Cc: Greg Thelen Cc: Oscar Salvador Cc: Yang Shi Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c index c84aba2..b097076 100644 --- a/mm/vmscan.c +++ b/mm/vmscan.c @@ -524,7 +524,7 @@ static long add_nr_deferred(long nr, struct shrinker *shrinker, static bool can_demote(int nid, struct scan_control *sc) { - if (sc->no_demotion) + if (sc && sc->no_demotion) return false; if (next_demotion_node(nid) == NUMA_NO_NODE) return false; @@ -533,6 +533,31 @@ static bool can_demote(int nid, struct scan_control *sc) return false; } +static inline bool can_reclaim_anon_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, + int nid, + struct scan_control *sc) +{ + if (memcg == NULL) { + /* + * For non-memcg reclaim, is there + * space in any swap device? + */ + if (get_nr_swap_pages() > 0) + return true; + } else { + /* Is the memcg below its swap limit? */ + if (mem_cgroup_get_nr_swap_pages(memcg) > 0) + return true; + } + + /* + * The page can not be swapped. + * + * Can it be reclaimed from this node via demotion? + */ + return can_demote(nid, sc); +} + /* * This misses isolated pages which are not accounted for to save counters. * As the data only determines if reclaim or compaction continues, it is @@ -544,7 +569,7 @@ unsigned long zone_reclaimable_pages(struct zone *zone) nr = zone_page_state_snapshot(zone, NR_ZONE_INACTIVE_FILE) + zone_page_state_snapshot(zone, NR_ZONE_ACTIVE_FILE); - if (get_nr_swap_pages() > 0) + if (can_reclaim_anon_pages(NULL, zone_to_nid(zone), NULL)) nr += zone_page_state_snapshot(zone, NR_ZONE_INACTIVE_ANON) + zone_page_state_snapshot(zone, NR_ZONE_ACTIVE_ANON); @@ -2541,6 +2566,7 @@ enum scan_balance { static void get_scan_count(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc, unsigned long *nr) { + struct pglist_data *pgdat = lruvec_pgdat(lruvec); struct mem_cgroup *memcg = lruvec_memcg(lruvec); unsigned long anon_cost, file_cost, total_cost; int swappiness = mem_cgroup_swappiness(memcg); @@ -2551,7 +2577,7 @@ static void get_scan_count(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc, enum lru_list lru; /* If we have no swap space, do not bother scanning anon pages. */ - if (!sc->may_swap || mem_cgroup_get_nr_swap_pages(memcg) <= 0) { + if (!sc->may_swap || !can_reclaim_anon_pages(memcg, pgdat->node_id, sc)) { scan_balance = SCAN_FILE; goto out; } @@ -2929,7 +2955,7 @@ static inline bool should_continue_reclaim(struct pglist_data *pgdat, */ pages_for_compaction = compact_gap(sc->order); inactive_lru_pages = node_page_state(pgdat, NR_INACTIVE_FILE); - if (get_nr_swap_pages() > 0) + if (can_reclaim_anon_pages(NULL, pgdat->node_id, sc)) inactive_lru_pages += node_page_state(pgdat, NR_INACTIVE_ANON); return inactive_lru_pages > pages_for_compaction;