From: Viresh Kumar Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 06:15:08 +0000 (+0000) Subject: cpufreq: remove unnecessary cpufreq_cpu_{get|put}() calls X-Git-Tag: upstream/snapshot3+hdmi~4790^2~1^2~5^2~11 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=a262e94cdcb961762e5d91e7fcb857bba7d420a0;p=platform%2Fadaptation%2Frenesas_rcar%2Frenesas_kernel.git cpufreq: remove unnecessary cpufreq_cpu_{get|put}() calls struct cpufreq_policy is already passed as argument to some routines like: __cpufreq_driver_getavg() and so we don't really need to do cpufreq_cpu_get() before and cpufreq_cpu_put() in them to get a policy structure. Remove them. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki --- diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c index ce9273a7..f8c2860 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c @@ -1572,10 +1572,6 @@ int cpufreq_driver_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, { int ret = -EINVAL; - policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(policy->cpu); - if (!policy) - goto no_policy; - if (unlikely(lock_policy_rwsem_write(policy->cpu))) goto fail; @@ -1584,30 +1580,19 @@ int cpufreq_driver_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unlock_policy_rwsem_write(policy->cpu); fail: - cpufreq_cpu_put(policy); -no_policy: return ret; } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_driver_target); int __cpufreq_driver_getavg(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int cpu) { - int ret = 0; - if (cpufreq_disabled()) - return ret; + return 0; if (!cpufreq_driver->getavg) return 0; - policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(policy->cpu); - if (!policy) - return -EINVAL; - - ret = cpufreq_driver->getavg(policy, cpu); - - cpufreq_cpu_put(policy); - return ret; + return cpufreq_driver->getavg(policy, cpu); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__cpufreq_driver_getavg);