From: Jinjie Ruan Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2023 09:03:50 +0000 (+0800) Subject: kunit: test: Fix the possible memory leak in executor_test X-Git-Tag: v6.6.7~1323 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=a2431a39590f2ce2d68109458f3fa3f49a6e3534;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-starfive.git kunit: test: Fix the possible memory leak in executor_test [ Upstream commit 8040345fdae4cb256c5d981f91ae0f22bea8adcc ] When CONFIG_KUNIT_ALL_TESTS=y, making CONFIG_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK=y and CONFIG_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK_AUTO_SCAN=y, the below memory leak is detected. If kunit_filter_suites() succeeds, not only copy but also filtered_suite and filtered_suite->test_cases should be freed. So as Rae suggested, to avoid the suite set never be freed when KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ() fails and exits after kunit_filter_suites() succeeds, update kfree_at_end() func to free_suite_set_at_end() to use kunit_free_suite_set() to free them as kunit_module_exit() and kunit_run_all_tests() do it. As the second arg got of free_suite_set_at_end() is a local variable, copy it for free to avoid wild-memory-access. After applying this patch, the following memory leak is never detected. unreferenced object 0xffff8881001de400 (size 1024): comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 1396, jiffies 4294720452 (age 932.801s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 73 75 69 74 65 32 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 suite2.......... 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: [] __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x53/0x150 [] kmemdup+0x22/0x50 [] kunit_filter_suites+0x44d/0xcc0 [] filter_suites_test+0x12f/0x360 [] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x4a/0x90 [] kthread+0x2b6/0x380 [] ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x70 [] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 unreferenced object 0xffff8881052cd388 (size 192): comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 1396, jiffies 4294720452 (age 932.801s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): a0 85 9e 82 ff ff ff ff 80 cd 7c 84 ff ff ff ff ..........|..... 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: [] __kmalloc+0x52/0x150 [] kunit_filter_suites+0x481/0xcc0 [] filter_suites_test+0x12f/0x360 [] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x4a/0x90 [] kthread+0x2b6/0x380 [] ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x70 [] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 unreferenced object 0xffff888100da8400 (size 1024): comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 1398, jiffies 4294720454 (age 781.945s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 73 75 69 74 65 32 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 suite2.......... 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: [] __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x53/0x150 [] kmemdup+0x22/0x50 [] kunit_filter_suites+0x44d/0xcc0 [] filter_suites_test_glob_test+0x12f/0x560 [] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x4a/0x90 [] kthread+0x2b6/0x380 [] ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x70 [] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 unreferenced object 0xffff888105117878 (size 96): comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 1398, jiffies 4294720454 (age 781.945s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): a0 85 9e 82 ff ff ff ff a0 ac 7c 84 ff ff ff ff ..........|..... 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: [] __kmalloc+0x52/0x150 [] kunit_filter_suites+0x481/0xcc0 [] filter_suites_test_glob_test+0x12f/0x560 [] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x4a/0x90 [] kthread+0x2b6/0x380 [] ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x70 [] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 unreferenced object 0xffff888102c31c00 (size 1024): comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 1404, jiffies 4294720460 (age 781.948s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 6e 6f 72 6d 61 6c 5f 73 75 69 74 65 00 00 00 00 normal_suite.... 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: [] __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x53/0x150 [] kmemdup+0x22/0x50 [] kunit_filter_attr_tests+0xf7/0x860 [] kunit_filter_suites+0x82f/0xcc0 [] filter_attr_test+0x195/0x5f0 [] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x4a/0x90 [] kthread+0x2b6/0x380 [] ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x70 [] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 unreferenced object 0xffff8881052cd250 (size 192): comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 1404, jiffies 4294720460 (age 781.948s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): a0 85 9e 82 ff ff ff ff 00 a9 7c 84 ff ff ff ff ..........|..... 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: [] __kmalloc+0x52/0x150 [] kunit_filter_attr_tests+0x1a1/0x860 [] kunit_filter_suites+0x82f/0xcc0 [] filter_attr_test+0x195/0x5f0 [] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x4a/0x90 [] kthread+0x2b6/0x380 [] ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x70 [] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 unreferenced object 0xffff888104f4e400 (size 1024): comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 1408, jiffies 4294720464 (age 781.944s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 73 75 69 74 65 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 suite........... 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: [] __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x53/0x150 [] kmemdup+0x22/0x50 [] kunit_filter_attr_tests+0xf7/0x860 [] kunit_filter_suites+0x82f/0xcc0 [] filter_attr_skip_test+0x133/0x6e0 [] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x4a/0x90 [] kthread+0x2b6/0x380 [] ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x70 [] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 unreferenced object 0xffff8881052cc620 (size 192): comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 1408, jiffies 4294720464 (age 781.944s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): a0 85 9e 82 ff ff ff ff c0 a8 7c 84 ff ff ff ff ..........|..... 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 02 00 00 00 02 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: [] __kmalloc+0x52/0x150 [] kunit_filter_attr_tests+0x1a1/0x860 [] kunit_filter_suites+0x82f/0xcc0 [] filter_attr_skip_test+0x133/0x6e0 [] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x4a/0x90 [] kthread+0x2b6/0x380 [] ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x70 [] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 Fixes: e5857d396f35 ("kunit: flatten kunit_suite*** to kunit_suite** in .kunit_test_suites") Fixes: 76066f93f1df ("kunit: add tests for filtering attributes") Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan Suggested-by: Rae Moar Reviewed-by: David Gow Suggested-by: David Gow Reported-by: kernel test robot Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309142251.uJ8saAZv-lkp@intel.com/ Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309270433.wGmFRGjd-lkp@intel.com/ Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- diff --git a/lib/kunit/executor_test.c b/lib/kunit/executor_test.c index b4f6f96..22d4ee8 100644 --- a/lib/kunit/executor_test.c +++ b/lib/kunit/executor_test.c @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ #include #include -static void kfree_at_end(struct kunit *test, const void *to_free); +static void free_suite_set_at_end(struct kunit *test, const void *to_free); static struct kunit_suite *alloc_fake_suite(struct kunit *test, const char *suite_name, struct kunit_case *test_cases); @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ static void filter_suites_test(struct kunit *test) got = kunit_filter_suites(&suite_set, "suite2", NULL, NULL, &err); KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, got.start); KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, err, 0); - kfree_at_end(test, got.start); + free_suite_set_at_end(test, &got); /* Validate we just have suite2 */ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, got.start[0]); @@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ static void filter_suites_test_glob_test(struct kunit *test) got = kunit_filter_suites(&suite_set, "suite2.test2", NULL, NULL, &err); KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, got.start); KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, err, 0); - kfree_at_end(test, got.start); + free_suite_set_at_end(test, &got); /* Validate we just have suite2 */ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, got.start[0]); @@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ static void filter_suites_to_empty_test(struct kunit *test) got = kunit_filter_suites(&suite_set, "not_found", NULL, NULL, &err); KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, err, 0); - kfree_at_end(test, got.start); /* just in case */ + free_suite_set_at_end(test, &got); /* just in case */ KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ_MSG(test, got.start, got.end, "should be empty to indicate no match"); @@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ static void filter_attr_test(struct kunit *test) got = kunit_filter_suites(&suite_set, NULL, filter, NULL, &err); KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, got.start); KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, err, 0); - kfree_at_end(test, got.start); + free_suite_set_at_end(test, &got); /* Validate we just have normal_suite */ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, got.start[0]); @@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ static void filter_attr_empty_test(struct kunit *test) got = kunit_filter_suites(&suite_set, NULL, filter, NULL, &err); KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, err, 0); - kfree_at_end(test, got.start); /* just in case */ + free_suite_set_at_end(test, &got); /* just in case */ KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ_MSG(test, got.start, got.end, "should be empty to indicate no match"); @@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ static void filter_attr_skip_test(struct kunit *test) got = kunit_filter_suites(&suite_set, NULL, filter, "skip", &err); KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, got.start); KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, err, 0); - kfree_at_end(test, got.start); + free_suite_set_at_end(test, &got); /* Validate we have both the slow and normal test */ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, got.start[0]->test_cases); @@ -256,18 +256,26 @@ kunit_test_suites(&executor_test_suite); /* Test helpers */ -/* Use the resource API to register a call to kfree(to_free). +static void free_suite_set(void *suite_set) +{ + kunit_free_suite_set(*(struct kunit_suite_set *)suite_set); + kfree(suite_set); +} + +/* Use the resource API to register a call to free_suite_set. * Since we never actually use the resource, it's safe to use on const data. */ -static void kfree_at_end(struct kunit *test, const void *to_free) +static void free_suite_set_at_end(struct kunit *test, const void *to_free) { - /* kfree() handles NULL already, but avoid allocating a no-op cleanup. */ - if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(to_free)) + struct kunit_suite_set *free; + + if (!((struct kunit_suite_set *)to_free)->start) return; - kunit_add_action(test, - (kunit_action_t *)kfree, - (void *)to_free); + free = kzalloc(sizeof(struct kunit_suite_set), GFP_KERNEL); + *free = *(struct kunit_suite_set *)to_free; + + kunit_add_action(test, free_suite_set, (void *)free); } static struct kunit_suite *alloc_fake_suite(struct kunit *test,