From: kyukhin <kyukhin@138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 12:44:59 +0000 (+0000)
Subject:         * gcc/config/ia64/ia64.c (ia64_split_tmode_move): Mark
X-Git-Tag: upstream/4.9.2~2892
X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=a0aa85e7baafa470786177837372500822dc119c;p=platform%2Fupstream%2Flinaro-gcc.git

    * gcc/config/ia64/ia64.c (ia64_split_tmode_move): Mark
        load with `dead' flag if it kills address, not its
        post-increment.



git-svn-id: svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk@204948 138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4
---

diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog
index 72e707a..2ed1b63 100644
--- a/gcc/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+2013-11-18  Kirill Yukhin  <kirill.yukhin@intel.com>
+
+	* gcc/config/ia64/ia64.c (ia64_split_tmode_move): Mark
+	load with `dead' flag if it kills address, not its
+	post-increment.
+
 2013-11-18  Ilya Enkovich  <ilya.enkovich@intel.com>
 
 	* builtin-types.def (BT_FN_PTR_CONST_PTR_VAR): New.
diff --git a/gcc/config/ia64/ia64.c b/gcc/config/ia64/ia64.c
index e6bd96d..4fde7aa 100644
--- a/gcc/config/ia64/ia64.c
+++ b/gcc/config/ia64/ia64.c
@@ -1525,23 +1525,22 @@ ia64_split_tmode_move (rtx operands[])
      the value it points to.  In that case we have to do the loads in
      the appropriate order so that the pointer is not destroyed too
      early.  Also we must not generate a postmodify for that second
-     load, or rws_access_regno will die.  */
+     load, or rws_access_regno will die.  And we must not generate a
+     postmodify for the second load if the destination register 
+     overlaps with the base register.  */
   if (GET_CODE (operands[1]) == MEM
       && reg_overlap_mentioned_p (operands[0], operands[1]))
     {
       rtx base = XEXP (operands[1], 0);
-      rtx first_write = gen_rtx_REG (DImode, REGNO (operands[0]));
       while (GET_CODE (base) != REG)
 	base = XEXP (base, 0);
 
       if (REGNO (base) == REGNO (operands[0]))
-	{
-	  reversed = true;
-	  first_write = gen_rtx_REG (DImode, REGNO (operands[0]) + 1);
-	}
+	reversed = true;
 
-      if (GET_CODE (operands[0]) == REG
-	  && reg_overlap_mentioned_p (first_write, operands[1]))
+      if (refers_to_regno_p (REGNO (operands[0]),
+			     REGNO (operands[0])+2,
+			     base, 0))
 	dead = true;
     }
   /* Another reason to do the moves in reversed order is if the first