From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 16:59:23 +0000 (-0700)
Subject: workqueue: use __cpuinit instead of __devinit for cpu callbacks
X-Git-Tag: upstream/snapshot3+hdmi~6570^2~6
X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=9fdf9b73d61c87a9c16f101bb8bbe069d13046f5;p=platform%2Fadaptation%2Frenesas_rcar%2Frenesas_kernel.git

workqueue: use __cpuinit instead of __devinit for cpu callbacks

For workqueue hotplug callbacks, it makes less sense to use __devinit
which discards the memory after boot if !HOTPLUG.  __cpuinit, which
discards the memory after boot if !HOTPLUG_CPU fits better.

tj: Updated description.

Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
---

diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index e651239..942bb75 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -3548,7 +3548,7 @@ static void gcwq_unbind_fn(struct work_struct *work)
  * Workqueues should be brought up before normal priority CPU notifiers.
  * This will be registered high priority CPU notifier.
  */
-static int __devinit workqueue_cpu_up_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
+static int __cpuinit workqueue_cpu_up_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
 					       unsigned long action,
 					       void *hcpu)
 {
@@ -3589,7 +3589,7 @@ static int __devinit workqueue_cpu_up_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
  * Workqueues should be brought down after normal priority CPU notifiers.
  * This will be registered as low priority CPU notifier.
  */
-static int __devinit workqueue_cpu_down_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
+static int __cpuinit workqueue_cpu_down_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
 						 unsigned long action,
 						 void *hcpu)
 {