From: Rajiv Andrade Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 17:34:37 +0000 (-0300) Subject: TPM: Use vendor specific function for status probe X-Git-Tag: v3.3-rc1~105^2^2~13^2~3 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=9efa54f002cc03fdb4e9d8d508aa996af01c48d0;p=profile%2Fivi%2Fkernel-x86-ivi.git TPM: Use vendor specific function for status probe Moved from using tpm_tis_status() to the vendor specific one in wait_for_stat(). This way other TPM drivers can use it instead of reimplementing another. Signed-off-by: Rajiv Andrade --- diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c index d93bafd..e4553eb 100644 --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c @@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ static int wait_for_stat(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 mask, unsigned long timeout, u8 status; /* check current status */ - status = tpm_tis_status(chip); + status = chip->vendor.status(chip); if ((status & mask) == mask) return 0; @@ -213,9 +213,9 @@ again: if ((long)timeout <= 0) return -ETIME; rc = wait_event_interruptible_timeout(*queue, - ((tpm_tis_status - (chip) & mask) == - mask), timeout); + ((chip->vendor.status(chip) + & mask) == mask), + timeout); if (rc > 0) return 0; if (rc == -ERESTARTSYS && freezing(current)) { @@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ again: } else { do { msleep(TPM_TIMEOUT); - status = tpm_tis_status(chip); + status = chip->vendor.status(chip); if ((status & mask) == mask) return 0; } while (time_before(jiffies, stop));