From: Sean Christopherson Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 22:39:23 +0000 (-0800) Subject: KVM: nVMX: Sign extend displacements of VMX instr's mem operands X-Git-Tag: v4.19.31~5 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=9ce0ffeb68b6b78c5186add2295d961226b0bbf9;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-rpi.git KVM: nVMX: Sign extend displacements of VMX instr's mem operands commit 946c522b603f281195af1df91837a1d4d1eb3bc9 upstream. The VMCS.EXIT_QUALIFCATION field reports the displacements of memory operands for various instructions, including VMX instructions, as a naturally sized unsigned value, but masks the value by the addr size, e.g. given a ModRM encoded as -0x28(%ebp), the -0x28 displacement is reported as 0xffffffd8 for a 32-bit address size. Despite some weird wording regarding sign extension, the SDM explicitly states that bits beyond the instructions address size are undefined: In all cases, bits of this field beyond the instruction’s address size are undefined. Failure to sign extend the displacement results in KVM incorrectly treating a negative displacement as a large positive displacement when the address size of the VMX instruction is smaller than KVM's native size, e.g. a 32-bit address size on a 64-bit KVM. The very original decoding, added by commit 064aea774768 ("KVM: nVMX: Decoding memory operands of VMX instructions"), sort of modeled sign extension by truncating the final virtual/linear address for a 32-bit address size. I.e. it messed up the effective address but made it work by adjusting the final address. When segmentation checks were added, the truncation logic was kept as-is and no sign extension logic was introduced. In other words, it kept calculating the wrong effective address while mostly generating the correct virtual/linear address. As the effective address is what's used in the segment limit checks, this results in KVM incorreclty injecting #GP/#SS faults due to non-existent segment violations when a nested VMM uses negative displacements with an address size smaller than KVM's native address size. Using the -0x28(%ebp) example, an EBP value of 0x1000 will result in KVM using 0x100000fd8 as the effective address when checking for a segment limit violation. This causes a 100% failure rate when running a 32-bit KVM build as L1 on top of a 64-bit KVM L0. Fixes: f9eb4af67c9d ("KVM: nVMX: VMX instructions: add checks for #GP/#SS exceptions") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c index f6da5c3..74a96aa 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c @@ -8184,6 +8184,10 @@ static int get_vmx_mem_address(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, /* Addr = segment_base + offset */ /* offset = base + [index * scale] + displacement */ off = exit_qualification; /* holds the displacement */ + if (addr_size == 1) + off = (gva_t)sign_extend64(off, 31); + else if (addr_size == 0) + off = (gva_t)sign_extend64(off, 15); if (base_is_valid) off += kvm_register_read(vcpu, base_reg); if (index_is_valid)