From: barbieri <barbieri@7cbeb6ba-43b4-40fd-8cce-4c39aea84d33>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 22:38:52 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: Let's see if this edje forced recalc is really required.
X-Git-Tag: 2.0_alpha~163^2~949
X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=9c765cdabca9b9df9d2b2da2ee86aa7bf645c29d;p=framework%2Fuifw%2Fedje.git

Let's see if this edje forced recalc is really required.


git-svn-id: svn+ssh://svn.enlightenment.org/var/svn/e/trunk/edje@38689 7cbeb6ba-43b4-40fd-8cce-4c39aea84d33
---

diff --git a/src/lib/edje_util.c b/src/lib/edje_util.c
index deecee4..8c27149 100644
--- a/src/lib/edje_util.c
+++ b/src/lib/edje_util.c
@@ -1101,7 +1101,10 @@ edje_object_part_swallow(Evas_Object *obj, const char *part, Evas_Object *obj_sw
    if ((!ed) || (!part)) return;
 
    /* Need to recalc before providing the object. */
-   _edje_recalc_do(ed);
+   // XXX: I guess this is not required, removing for testing purposes
+   // XXX: uncomment if you see glitches in e17 or others.
+   // XXX: by Gustavo, January 21th 2009.
+   //_edje_recalc_do(ed);
 
    rp = _edje_real_part_recursive_get(ed, (char *)part);
    if (!rp) return;