From: Frederic Weisbecker Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 02:58:48 +0000 (+0200) Subject: perf/hw_breakpoint: Split attribute parse and commit X-Git-Tag: v4.19~478^2~20 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=9a4903dde2c8633c5fcf887b98c4e047a6154a54;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-rpi.git perf/hw_breakpoint: Split attribute parse and commit arch_validate_hwbkpt_settings() mixes up attribute check and commit into a single code entity. Therefore the validation may return an error due to incorrect atributes while still leaving halfway modified architecture breakpoint data. This is harmless when we deal with a new breakpoint but it becomes a problem when we modify an existing breakpoint. Split attribute parse and commit to fix that. The architecture is passed a "struct arch_hw_breakpoint" to fill on top of the new attr and the core takes care about copying the backend data once it's fully validated. The architectures then need to implement the new API. Original-patch-by: Andy Lutomirski Reported-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker Cc: Alexander Shishkin Cc: Andy Lutomirski Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Cc: Catalin Marinas Cc: Chris Zankel Cc: Jiri Olsa Cc: Joel Fernandes Cc: Mark Rutland Cc: Max Filippov Cc: Michael Ellerman Cc: Namhyung Kim Cc: Paul Mackerras Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Rich Felker Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Will Deacon Cc: Yoshinori Sato Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1529981939-8231-2-git-send-email-frederic@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- diff --git a/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c b/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c index 6e28d28..314e2a9 100644 --- a/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c +++ b/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c @@ -400,16 +400,35 @@ int dbg_release_bp_slot(struct perf_event *bp) return 0; } -static int validate_hw_breakpoint(struct perf_event *bp) +#ifndef hw_breakpoint_arch_parse +int hw_breakpoint_arch_parse(struct perf_event *bp, + const struct perf_event_attr *attr, + struct arch_hw_breakpoint *hw) { - int ret; + int err; - ret = arch_validate_hwbkpt_settings(bp); - if (ret) - return ret; + err = arch_validate_hwbkpt_settings(bp); + if (err) + return err; + + *hw = bp->hw.info; + + return 0; +} +#endif + +static int hw_breakpoint_parse(struct perf_event *bp, + const struct perf_event_attr *attr, + struct arch_hw_breakpoint *hw) +{ + int err; + + err = hw_breakpoint_arch_parse(bp, attr, hw); + if (err) + return err; if (arch_check_bp_in_kernelspace(bp)) { - if (bp->attr.exclude_kernel) + if (attr->exclude_kernel) return -EINVAL; /* * Don't let unprivileged users set a breakpoint in the trap @@ -424,19 +443,22 @@ static int validate_hw_breakpoint(struct perf_event *bp) int register_perf_hw_breakpoint(struct perf_event *bp) { - int ret; - - ret = reserve_bp_slot(bp); - if (ret) - return ret; + struct arch_hw_breakpoint hw; + int err; - ret = validate_hw_breakpoint(bp); + err = reserve_bp_slot(bp); + if (err) + return err; - /* if arch_validate_hwbkpt_settings() fails then release bp slot */ - if (ret) + err = hw_breakpoint_parse(bp, &bp->attr, &hw); + if (err) { release_bp_slot(bp); + return err; + } - return ret; + bp->hw.info = hw; + + return 0; } /** @@ -464,6 +486,7 @@ modify_user_hw_breakpoint_check(struct perf_event *bp, struct perf_event_attr *a u64 old_len = bp->attr.bp_len; int old_type = bp->attr.bp_type; bool modify = attr->bp_type != old_type; + struct arch_hw_breakpoint hw; int err = 0; bp->attr.bp_addr = attr->bp_addr; @@ -473,7 +496,7 @@ modify_user_hw_breakpoint_check(struct perf_event *bp, struct perf_event_attr *a if (check && memcmp(&bp->attr, attr, sizeof(*attr))) return -EINVAL; - err = validate_hw_breakpoint(bp); + err = hw_breakpoint_parse(bp, attr, &hw); if (!err && modify) err = modify_bp_slot(bp, old_type); @@ -484,7 +507,9 @@ modify_user_hw_breakpoint_check(struct perf_event *bp, struct perf_event_attr *a return err; } + bp->hw.info = hw; bp->attr.disabled = attr->disabled; + return 0; }