From: David Gow Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 19:31:57 +0000 (-0700) Subject: Documentation: kunit: Clean up some string casts in examples X-Git-Tag: accepted/tizen/unified/20230118.172025~6926^2~19 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=99a8e899fab95be3e6b66edf7b303a58f6997be4;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-rpi.git Documentation: kunit: Clean up some string casts in examples As the type checking is no longer excessively strict, get rid of the unsightly (char*) casts -- and comment discussing them -- from the KUnit usage page. Signed-off-by: David Gow Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov Acked-by: Brendan Higgins Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan --- diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst index 888c341..97c9a31 100644 --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst @@ -465,10 +465,9 @@ fictitious example for ``sha1sum(1)`` .. code-block:: c - /* Note: the cast is to satisfy overly strict type-checking. */ #define TEST_SHA1(in, want) \ sha1sum(in, out); \ - KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, (char *)out, want, "sha1sum(%s)", in); + KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, out, want, "sha1sum(%s)", in); char out[40]; TEST_SHA1("hello world", "2aae6c35c94fcfb415dbe95f408b9ce91ee846ed"); @@ -507,7 +506,7 @@ In some cases, it can be helpful to write a *table-driven test* instead, e.g. }; for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(cases); ++i) { sha1sum(cases[i].str, out); - KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, (char *)out, cases[i].sha1, + KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, out, cases[i].sha1, "sha1sum(%s)", cases[i].str); } @@ -568,7 +567,7 @@ Reusing the same ``cases`` array from above, we can write the test as a struct sha1_test_case *test_param = (struct sha1_test_case *)(test->param_value); sha1sum(test_param->str, out); - KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, (char *)out, test_param->sha1, + KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, out, test_param->sha1, "sha1sum(%s)", test_param->str); }