From: Jiri Pirko Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2023 07:12:17 +0000 (-0700) Subject: net/mlx5: Skip inline mode check after mlx5_eswitch_enable_locked() failure X-Git-Tag: v6.6.17~4555^2~144^2~2 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=97bd788efb9052963b43ba41c8aaff3ed12e1ede;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-rpi.git net/mlx5: Skip inline mode check after mlx5_eswitch_enable_locked() failure Commit bffaa916588e ("net/mlx5: E-Switch, Add control for inline mode") added inline mode checking to esw_offloads_start() with a warning printed out in case there is a problem. Tne inline mode checking was done even after mlx5_eswitch_enable_locked() call failed, which is pointless. Later on, commit 8c98ee77d911 ("net/mlx5e: E-Switch, Add extack messages to devlink callbacks") converted the error/warning prints to extack setting, which caused that the inline mode check error to overwrite possible previous extack message when mlx5_eswitch_enable_locked() failed. User then gets confusing error message. Fix this by skipping check of inline mode after mlx5_eswitch_enable_locked() call failed. Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed --- diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c index 29de4e7..eafb098 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c @@ -2178,6 +2178,7 @@ static int esw_offloads_start(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw, "Failed setting eswitch to offloads"); esw->mode = MLX5_ESWITCH_LEGACY; mlx5_rescan_drivers(esw->dev); + return err; } if (esw->offloads.inline_mode == MLX5_INLINE_MODE_NONE) { if (mlx5_eswitch_inline_mode_get(esw, @@ -2187,7 +2188,7 @@ static int esw_offloads_start(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw, "Inline mode is different between vports"); } } - return err; + return 0; } static void mlx5_esw_offloads_rep_mark_set(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw,