From: H.J. Lu Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 14:08:47 +0000 (+0000) Subject: 2007-10-11 H.J. Lu X-Git-Tag: sid-snapshot-20071101~319 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=96ef6e0f8b717fa45ac9f1674cd4b19d9f47358d;p=platform%2Fupstream%2Fbinutils.git 2007-10-11 H.J. Lu * doc/c-i386.texi: Update which instruction's operands are swapped. --- diff --git a/gas/ChangeLog b/gas/ChangeLog index fb69c95..72d21a2 100644 --- a/gas/ChangeLog +++ b/gas/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,8 @@ +2007-10-11 H.J. Lu + + * doc/c-i386.texi: Update which instruction's operands are + swapped. + 2007-10-11 Nick Clifton PR gas/5155 diff --git a/gas/doc/c-i386.texi b/gas/doc/c-i386.texi index 48b251a..869aff6 100644 --- a/gas/doc/c-i386.texi +++ b/gas/doc/c-i386.texi @@ -178,9 +178,9 @@ operands are prefixed by @samp{*}; they are undelimited in Intel syntax. AT&T and Intel syntax use the opposite order for source and destination operands. Intel @samp{add eax, 4} is @samp{addl $4, %eax}. The @samp{source, dest} convention is maintained for compatibility with -previous Unix assemblers. Note that instructions with more than one -source operand, such as the @samp{enter} instruction, do @emph{not} have -reversed order. @ref{i386-Bugs}. +previous Unix assemblers. Note that @samp{bound}, @samp{invlpga}, and +instructions with 2 immediate operands, such as the @samp{enter} +instruction, do @emph{not} have reversed order. @ref{i386-Bugs}. @cindex mnemonic suffixes, i386 @cindex sizes operands, i386