From: Roman Lebedev <lebedev.ri@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2019 19:29:10 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: [InstCombine][NFC] Use SimplifyAddInst() instead of SimplifyBinOp(Instruction::Binary... 
X-Git-Tag: llvmorg-11-init~12188
X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=96474d17c618348487760893cfeb7199fd4a3c7c;p=platform%2Fupstream%2Fllvm.git

[InstCombine][NFC] Use SimplifyAddInst() instead of SimplifyBinOp(Instruction::BinaryOps::Add, )

llvm-svn: 368521
---

diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineCompares.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineCompares.cpp
index f82a5b1..46294ad 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineCompares.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineCompares.cpp
@@ -3343,8 +3343,8 @@ foldShiftIntoShiftInAnotherHandOfAndInICmp(ICmpInst &I, const SimplifyQuery SQ,
   }
 
   // Can we fold (XShAmt+YShAmt) ?
-  Value *NewShAmt = SimplifyBinOp(Instruction::BinaryOps::Add, XShAmt, YShAmt,
-                                  SQ.getWithInstruction(&I));
+  Value *NewShAmt = SimplifyAddInst(XShAmt, YShAmt, /*IsNSW=*/false,
+                                    /*IsNUW=*/false, SQ.getWithInstruction(&I));
   if (!NewShAmt)
     return nullptr;
   // Is the new shift amount smaller than the bit width?