From: Paweł Piskorski <pawel.piskorski@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2014 15:09:44 +0000 (+0800)
Subject: ASoC: Intel: Don't issue ipc when processing response
X-Git-Tag: v5.15~17162^2~37^2~7^2~1
X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=94ce33456dbada5cb6ae1e10bd8895f034de731d;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-starfive.git

ASoC: Intel: Don't issue ipc when processing response

Make sure we dont issue IPC when we are processing a response.

Signed-off-by: Paweł Piskorski <pawel.piskorski@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jie Yang <yang.jie@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
---

diff --git a/sound/soc/intel/sst-haswell-ipc.c b/sound/soc/intel/sst-haswell-ipc.c
index 1ca71a2..ae204a6 100644
--- a/sound/soc/intel/sst-haswell-ipc.c
+++ b/sound/soc/intel/sst-haswell-ipc.c
@@ -457,9 +457,10 @@ static void ipc_tx_msgs(struct kthread_work *work)
 		return;
 	}
 
-	/* if the DSP is busy we will TX messages after IRQ */
+	/* if the DSP is busy, we will TX messages after IRQ.
+	 * also postpone if we are in the middle of procesing completion irq*/
 	ipcx = sst_dsp_shim_read_unlocked(hsw->dsp, SST_IPCX);
-	if (ipcx & SST_IPCX_BUSY) {
+	if (ipcx & (SST_IPCX_BUSY | SST_IPCX_DONE)) {
 		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hsw->dsp->spinlock, flags);
 		return;
 	}