From: Thomas Gleixner Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 13:36:36 +0000 (+0200) Subject: ARM/LPC32xx: Use irq not hwirq for __irq_set_handler_locked() X-Git-Tag: v4.14-rc1~5082^2~1 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=93b6eb77b49064ed1de5726560a0849f3ebccc2c;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-rpi.git ARM/LPC32xx: Use irq not hwirq for __irq_set_handler_locked() irq_data->hwirq is not guaranteed to be the same as irq_data->irq. It might be in that particular case, but it's wrong nevertheless. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Roland Stigge --- diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-lpc32xx/irq.c b/arch/arm/mach-lpc32xx/irq.c index 9ecb8f9..d4f7dc8 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-lpc32xx/irq.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-lpc32xx/irq.c @@ -283,25 +283,25 @@ static int lpc32xx_set_irq_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type) case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING: /* Rising edge sensitive */ __lpc32xx_set_irq_type(d->hwirq, 1, 1); - __irq_set_handler_locked(d->hwirq, handle_edge_irq); + __irq_set_handler_locked(d->irq, handle_edge_irq); break; case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING: /* Falling edge sensitive */ __lpc32xx_set_irq_type(d->hwirq, 0, 1); - __irq_set_handler_locked(d->hwirq, handle_edge_irq); + __irq_set_handler_locked(d->irq, handle_edge_irq); break; case IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW: /* Low level sensitive */ __lpc32xx_set_irq_type(d->hwirq, 0, 0); - __irq_set_handler_locked(d->hwirq, handle_level_irq); + __irq_set_handler_locked(d->irq, handle_level_irq); break; case IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH: /* High level sensitive */ __lpc32xx_set_irq_type(d->hwirq, 1, 0); - __irq_set_handler_locked(d->hwirq, handle_level_irq); + __irq_set_handler_locked(d->irq, handle_level_irq); break; /* Other modes are not supported */