From: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2014 14:59:36 +0000 (-0400)
Subject: btrfs-progs: skip extent rebuild test if no testdev
X-Git-Tag: upstream/4.16.1~2673
X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=935457f16446012841f8da5a5c9804063d76b366;p=platform%2Fupstream%2Fbtrfs-progs.git

btrfs-progs: skip extent rebuild test if no testdev

It is highly obnoxious to have to go put in a testdev when all you really want
is to run the quick image tests.  Make this part optional so if we don't have a
testdev specified we just don't run that particular test.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
---

diff --git a/tests/fsck-tests.sh b/tests/fsck-tests.sh
index b783b78..867366b 100644
--- a/tests/fsck-tests.sh
+++ b/tests/fsck-tests.sh
@@ -24,10 +24,6 @@ run_check()
 
 rm -f $RESULT
 
-if [ -z $TEST_DEV ] || [ -z $TEST_MNT ];then
-	_fail "please set TEST_DEV and TEST_MNT"
-fi
-
 # test rely on corrupting blocks tool
 run_check make btrfs-corrupt-block
 
@@ -45,6 +41,11 @@ do
 	run_check $here/btrfsck test.img
 done
 
+if [ -z $TEST_DEV ] || [ -z $TEST_MNT ];then
+	echo "     [NOTRUN] extent tree rebuild"
+	exit 0
+fi
+
 # test whether fsck can rebuild a corrupted extent tree
 test_extent_tree_rebuild()
 {