From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 15:37:14 +0000 (-0700)
Subject: Fix crash with irqpoll due to the IRQF_IRQPOLL flag testing
X-Git-Tag: v2.6.22-rc3~19
X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=92ea77275b5345c1300433f28689493dc4163f24;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-3.10.git

Fix crash with irqpoll due to the IRQF_IRQPOLL flag testing

With irqpoll enabled, trying to test the IRQF_IRQPOLL flag in the
actions would cause a NULL pointer dereference if no action was
installed (for example, the driver might have been unloaded with
interrupts still pending).

So be a bit more careful about testing the flag by making sure to test
for that case.

(The actual _change_ is trivial, the patch is more than a one-liner
because I rewrote the testing to also be much more readable.

Original (discarded) bugfix by Bernhard Walle.

Cc: Bernhard Walle <bwalle@suse.de>
Tested-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@in.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
---

diff --git a/kernel/irq/spurious.c b/kernel/irq/spurious.c
index b0d81aa..bd9e272 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/spurious.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/spurious.c
@@ -135,6 +135,39 @@ report_bad_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc, irqreturn_t action_ret)
 	}
 }
 
+static inline int try_misrouted_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc, irqreturn_t action_ret)
+{
+	struct irqaction *action;
+
+	if (!irqfixup)
+		return 0;
+
+	/* We didn't actually handle the IRQ - see if it was misrouted? */
+	if (action_ret == IRQ_NONE)
+		return 1;
+
+	/*
+	 * But for 'irqfixup == 2' we also do it for handled interrupts if
+	 * they are marked as IRQF_IRQPOLL (or for irq zero, which is the
+	 * traditional PC timer interrupt.. Legacy)
+	 */
+	if (irqfixup < 2)
+		return 0;
+
+	if (!irq)
+		return 1;
+
+	/*
+	 * Since we don't get the descriptor lock, "action" can
+	 * change under us.  We don't really care, but we don't
+	 * want to follow a NULL pointer. So tell the compiler to
+	 * just load it once by using a barrier.
+	 */
+	action = desc->action;
+	barrier();
+	return action && (action->flags & IRQF_IRQPOLL);
+}
+
 void note_interrupt(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc,
 		    irqreturn_t action_ret)
 {
@@ -144,15 +177,10 @@ void note_interrupt(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc,
 			report_bad_irq(irq, desc, action_ret);
 	}
 
-	if (unlikely(irqfixup)) {
-		/* Don't punish working computers */
-		if ((irqfixup == 2 && ((irq == 0) ||
-				(desc->action->flags & IRQF_IRQPOLL))) ||
-				action_ret == IRQ_NONE) {
-			int ok = misrouted_irq(irq);
-			if (action_ret == IRQ_NONE)
-				desc->irqs_unhandled -= ok;
-		}
+	if (unlikely(try_misrouted_irq(irq, desc, action_ret))) {
+		int ok = misrouted_irq(irq);
+		if (action_ret == IRQ_NONE)
+			desc->irqs_unhandled -= ok;
 	}
 
 	desc->irq_count++;