From: dingtianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2013 07:41:21 +0000 (+0800)
Subject: net: seeq: slight optimization of addr compare
X-Git-Tag: v3.14-rc1~94^2~340^2~4
X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=9116d7b06d32946d345b7f0423a5b0b6a9b040f7;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-exynos.git

net: seeq: slight optimization of addr compare

Use possibly more efficient ether_addr_equal
to instead of memcmp.

Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
---

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/seeq/sgiseeq.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/seeq/sgiseeq.c
index c765718..ced5b13 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/seeq/sgiseeq.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/seeq/sgiseeq.c
@@ -356,7 +356,7 @@ static inline void sgiseeq_rx(struct net_device *dev, struct sgiseeq_private *sp
 		if (pkt_status & SEEQ_RSTAT_FIG) {
 			/* Packet is OK. */
 			/* We don't want to receive our own packets */
-			if (memcmp(rd->skb->data + 6, dev->dev_addr, ETH_ALEN)) {
+			if (!ether_addr_equal(rd->skb->data + 6, dev->dev_addr)) {
 				if (len > rx_copybreak) {
 					skb = rd->skb;
 					newskb = netdev_alloc_skb(dev, PKT_BUF_SZ);