From: Jeff Law Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 21:20:03 +0000 (-0700) Subject: expmed.c (emit_store_flag): Extract updated comparison code from the return value... X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=8f08e8c0109982010936ca486b0a7ef7a3d8bd88;p=platform%2Fupstream%2Fgcc.git expmed.c (emit_store_flag): Extract updated comparison code from the return value of compare_from_rtx. * expmed.c (emit_store_flag): Extract updated comparison code from the return value of compare_from_rtx. * expr.c (do_store_flag): Similarly. From-SVN: r48128 --- diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog index 315c934..4ae0ce0 100644 --- a/gcc/ChangeLog +++ b/gcc/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +Mon Dec 17 14:21:21 2001 Jeffrey A Law (law@redhat.com) + + * expmed.c (emit_store_flag): Extract updated comparison code + from the return value of compare_from_rtx. + * expr.c (do_store_flag): Similarly. + 2001-12-17 Nick Clifton * caller-save.c (init_caller_save): Use MODE_BASE_REG_CLASS in diff --git a/gcc/expmed.c b/gcc/expmed.c index 8eecca3..f2c4aa2 100644 --- a/gcc/expmed.c +++ b/gcc/expmed.c @@ -4350,12 +4350,13 @@ emit_store_flag (target, code, op0, op1, mode, unsignedp, normalizep) : normalizep == -1 ? constm1_rtx : const_true_rtx); - /* If the code of COMPARISON doesn't match CODE, something is - wrong; we can no longer be sure that we have the operation. - We could handle this case, but it should not happen. */ + /* The code of COMPARISON may not match CODE if compare_from_rtx + decided to swap its operands and reverse the original code. - if (GET_CODE (comparison) != code) - abort (); + We know that compare_from_rtx returns either a CONST_INT or + a new comparison code, so it is safe to just extract the + code from COMPARISON. */ + code = GET_CODE (comparison); /* Get a reference to the target in the proper mode for this insn. */ compare_mode = insn_data[(int) icode].operand[0].mode; diff --git a/gcc/expr.c b/gcc/expr.c index a36ce7b..74c8b44 100644 --- a/gcc/expr.c +++ b/gcc/expr.c @@ -10235,6 +10235,14 @@ do_store_flag (exp, target, mode, only_cheap) || (result != const0_rtx && invert)) ? const0_rtx : const1_rtx); + /* The code of RESULT may not match CODE if compare_from_rtx + decided to swap its operands and reverse the original code. + + We know that compare_from_rtx returns either a CONST_INT or + a new comparison code, so it is safe to just extract the + code from RESULT. */ + code = GET_CODE (result); + label = gen_label_rtx (); if (bcc_gen_fctn[(int) code] == 0) abort ();