From: Pan Xinhui Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 06:36:20 +0000 (+0800) Subject: acpi-cpufreq: Fix an ACPI perf unregister issue X-Git-Tag: v4.3-rc1~9^2~1^2~43^2~18 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=8cfcfd39000d54188e0df1e0fafe63f53897b62a;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-exynos.git acpi-cpufreq: Fix an ACPI perf unregister issue As policy->cpu may not be same in acpi_cpufreq_cpu_init() and acpi_cpufreq_cpu_exit(). There is a risk that we use different CPU to un/register ACPI performance. So acpi_processor_unregister_performance() may not be able to do the cleanup work. That causes a memory leak. And if there will be another acpi_processor_register_performance() call, it may also fail thanks to the internal check of pr->performace. So add a new struct acpi_cpufreq_data field, acpi_perf_cpu, to fix this issue. Signed-off-by: Pan Xinhui Acked-by: Viresh Kumar [ rjw: Changelog ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki --- diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c index e7fcaa6..de54ce1 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c @@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ struct acpi_cpufreq_data { struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq_table; unsigned int resume; unsigned int cpu_feature; + unsigned int acpi_perf_cpu; cpumask_var_t freqdomain_cpus; }; @@ -677,6 +678,7 @@ static int acpi_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) } data->acpi_data = per_cpu_ptr(acpi_perf_data, cpu); + data->acpi_perf_cpu = cpu; policy->driver_data = data; if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC)) @@ -861,7 +863,7 @@ static int acpi_cpufreq_cpu_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) if (data) { policy->driver_data = NULL; acpi_processor_unregister_performance(data->acpi_data, - policy->cpu); + data->acpi_perf_cpu); free_cpumask_var(data->freqdomain_cpus); kfree(data->freq_table); kfree(data);