From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2022 17:17:37 +0000 (+0300)
Subject: ARM: OMAP2+: Fix regression for smc calls for vmap stack
X-Git-Tag: v6.1-rc5~1641^2~4
X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=8cf8df89678aa5ab3eb206ccc7c8dee7c528bf50;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-starfive.git

ARM: OMAP2+: Fix regression for smc calls for vmap stack

Commit 9c46929e7989 ("ARM: implement THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK for uniprocessor
systems") started triggering an issue with smc calls hanging on boot as
VMAP_STACK is now enabled by default.

Based on discussions on the #armlinux irc channel, Arnd noticed that omaps
are using __pa() for stack for smc calls. This does not work with vmap
stack.

Let's fix the issue by changing the param arrays to use static param[5] for
each function for __pa() to work. This consumes a bit more memory compared
to adding a single static buffer, but avoids potential races with the smc
calls initializing the shared buffer. For omap_secure_dispatcher(), we need
to use a cpu specific buffer as there's nothing currently ensuring it only
gets called from cpu0.

Fixes: 9c46929e7989 ("ARM: implement THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK for uniprocessor systems")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220331171737.48211-1-tony@atomide.com
Suggested-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.c
index 0659ab4..11677fc 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.c
@@ -59,8 +59,13 @@ static void __init omap_optee_init_check(void)
 u32 omap_secure_dispatcher(u32 idx, u32 flag, u32 nargs, u32 arg1, u32 arg2,
 							 u32 arg3, u32 arg4)
 {
+	static u32 buf[NR_CPUS][5];
+	u32 *param;
+	int cpu;
 	u32 ret;
-	u32 param[5];
+
+	cpu = get_cpu();
+	param = buf[cpu];
 
 	param[0] = nargs;
 	param[1] = arg1;
@@ -76,6 +81,8 @@ u32 omap_secure_dispatcher(u32 idx, u32 flag, u32 nargs, u32 arg1, u32 arg2,
 	outer_clean_range(__pa(param), __pa(param + 5));
 	ret = omap_smc2(idx, flag, __pa(param));
 
+	put_cpu();
+
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -119,8 +126,8 @@ phys_addr_t omap_secure_ram_mempool_base(void)
 #if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP3) && defined(CONFIG_PM)
 u32 omap3_save_secure_ram(void __iomem *addr, int size)
 {
+	static u32 param[5];
 	u32 ret;
-	u32 param[5];
 
 	if (size != OMAP3_SAVE_SECURE_RAM_SZ)
 		return OMAP3_SAVE_SECURE_RAM_SZ;
@@ -153,8 +160,8 @@ u32 omap3_save_secure_ram(void __iomem *addr, int size)
 u32 rx51_secure_dispatcher(u32 idx, u32 process, u32 flag, u32 nargs,
 			   u32 arg1, u32 arg2, u32 arg3, u32 arg4)
 {
+	static u32 param[5];
 	u32 ret;
-	u32 param[5];
 
 	param[0] = nargs+1; /* RX-51 needs number of arguments + 1 */
 	param[1] = arg1;