From: Eric Dumazet Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 19:20:18 +0000 (+0000) Subject: net: fix lock_sock_bh/unlock_sock_bh X-Git-Tag: v2.6.35-rc1~24^2~14 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=8a74ad60a546b13bd1096b2a61a7a5c6fd9ae17c;p=platform%2Fupstream%2Fkernel-adaptation-pc.git net: fix lock_sock_bh/unlock_sock_bh This new sock lock primitive was introduced to speedup some user context socket manipulation. But it is unsafe to protect two threads, one using regular lock_sock/release_sock, one using lock_sock_bh/unlock_sock_bh This patch changes lock_sock_bh to be careful against 'owned' state. If owned is found to be set, we must take the slow path. lock_sock_bh() now returns a boolean to say if the slow path was taken, and this boolean is used at unlock_sock_bh time to call the appropriate unlock function. After this change, BH are either disabled or enabled during the lock_sock_bh/unlock_sock_bh protected section. This might be misleading, so we rename these functions to lock_sock_fast()/unlock_sock_fast(). Reported-by: Anton Blanchard Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet Tested-by: Anton Blanchard Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h index d2a71b0..ca241ea 100644 --- a/include/net/sock.h +++ b/include/net/sock.h @@ -1026,15 +1026,23 @@ extern void release_sock(struct sock *sk); SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING) #define bh_unlock_sock(__sk) spin_unlock(&((__sk)->sk_lock.slock)) -static inline void lock_sock_bh(struct sock *sk) +extern bool lock_sock_fast(struct sock *sk); +/** + * unlock_sock_fast - complement of lock_sock_fast + * @sk: socket + * @slow: slow mode + * + * fast unlock socket for user context. + * If slow mode is on, we call regular release_sock() + */ +static inline void unlock_sock_fast(struct sock *sk, bool slow) { - spin_lock_bh(&sk->sk_lock.slock); + if (slow) + release_sock(sk); + else + spin_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_lock.slock); } -static inline void unlock_sock_bh(struct sock *sk) -{ - spin_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_lock.slock); -} extern struct sock *sk_alloc(struct net *net, int family, gfp_t priority, diff --git a/net/core/datagram.c b/net/core/datagram.c index e009753..f5b6f43 100644 --- a/net/core/datagram.c +++ b/net/core/datagram.c @@ -229,15 +229,17 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(skb_free_datagram); void skb_free_datagram_locked(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb) { + bool slow; + if (likely(atomic_read(&skb->users) == 1)) smp_rmb(); else if (likely(!atomic_dec_and_test(&skb->users))) return; - lock_sock_bh(sk); + slow = lock_sock_fast(sk); skb_orphan(skb); sk_mem_reclaim_partial(sk); - unlock_sock_bh(sk); + unlock_sock_fast(sk, slow); /* skb is now orphaned, can be freed outside of locked section */ __kfree_skb(skb); diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c index 37fe9b6..2cf7f9f 100644 --- a/net/core/sock.c +++ b/net/core/sock.c @@ -2007,6 +2007,39 @@ void release_sock(struct sock *sk) } EXPORT_SYMBOL(release_sock); +/** + * lock_sock_fast - fast version of lock_sock + * @sk: socket + * + * This version should be used for very small section, where process wont block + * return false if fast path is taken + * sk_lock.slock locked, owned = 0, BH disabled + * return true if slow path is taken + * sk_lock.slock unlocked, owned = 1, BH enabled + */ +bool lock_sock_fast(struct sock *sk) +{ + might_sleep(); + spin_lock_bh(&sk->sk_lock.slock); + + if (!sk->sk_lock.owned) + /* + * Note : We must disable BH + */ + return false; + + __lock_sock(sk); + sk->sk_lock.owned = 1; + spin_unlock(&sk->sk_lock.slock); + /* + * The sk_lock has mutex_lock() semantics here: + */ + mutex_acquire(&sk->sk_lock.dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_); + local_bh_enable(); + return true; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL(lock_sock_fast); + int sock_get_timestamp(struct sock *sk, struct timeval __user *userstamp) { struct timeval tv; diff --git a/net/ipv4/udp.c b/net/ipv4/udp.c index 9de6a69..b9d0d40 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/udp.c +++ b/net/ipv4/udp.c @@ -1063,10 +1063,11 @@ static unsigned int first_packet_length(struct sock *sk) spin_unlock_bh(&rcvq->lock); if (!skb_queue_empty(&list_kill)) { - lock_sock_bh(sk); + bool slow = lock_sock_fast(sk); + __skb_queue_purge(&list_kill); sk_mem_reclaim_partial(sk); - unlock_sock_bh(sk); + unlock_sock_fast(sk, slow); } return res; } @@ -1123,6 +1124,7 @@ int udp_recvmsg(struct kiocb *iocb, struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, int peeked; int err; int is_udplite = IS_UDPLITE(sk); + bool slow; /* * Check any passed addresses @@ -1197,10 +1199,10 @@ out: return err; csum_copy_err: - lock_sock_bh(sk); + slow = lock_sock_fast(sk); if (!skb_kill_datagram(sk, skb, flags)) UDP_INC_STATS_USER(sock_net(sk), UDP_MIB_INERRORS, is_udplite); - unlock_sock_bh(sk); + unlock_sock_fast(sk, slow); if (noblock) return -EAGAIN; @@ -1625,9 +1627,9 @@ int udp_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb) void udp_destroy_sock(struct sock *sk) { - lock_sock_bh(sk); + bool slow = lock_sock_fast(sk); udp_flush_pending_frames(sk); - unlock_sock_bh(sk); + unlock_sock_fast(sk, slow); } /* diff --git a/net/ipv6/udp.c b/net/ipv6/udp.c index 3d7a2c0..87be586 100644 --- a/net/ipv6/udp.c +++ b/net/ipv6/udp.c @@ -328,6 +328,7 @@ int udpv6_recvmsg(struct kiocb *iocb, struct sock *sk, int err; int is_udplite = IS_UDPLITE(sk); int is_udp4; + bool slow; if (addr_len) *addr_len=sizeof(struct sockaddr_in6); @@ -424,7 +425,7 @@ out: return err; csum_copy_err: - lock_sock_bh(sk); + slow = lock_sock_fast(sk); if (!skb_kill_datagram(sk, skb, flags)) { if (is_udp4) UDP_INC_STATS_USER(sock_net(sk), @@ -433,7 +434,7 @@ csum_copy_err: UDP6_INC_STATS_USER(sock_net(sk), UDP_MIB_INERRORS, is_udplite); } - unlock_sock_bh(sk); + unlock_sock_fast(sk, slow); if (flags & MSG_DONTWAIT) return -EAGAIN;