From: Thomas Huth Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 15:22:05 +0000 (+0200) Subject: KVM: s390: Fixed priority of execution in STSI X-Git-Tag: upstream/snapshot3+hdmi~4793^2~24 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=87d41fb4da6467622b7a87fd6afe8071abab6dae;p=platform%2Fadaptation%2Frenesas_rcar%2Frenesas_kernel.git KVM: s390: Fixed priority of execution in STSI Added some missing validity checks for the operands and fixed the priority of exceptions for some function codes according to the "Principles of Operation" document. Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth Acked-by: Cornelia Huck Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini --- diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c b/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c index c7603f5..0da3e6e 100644 --- a/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c @@ -385,16 +385,27 @@ static int handle_stsi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) if (vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.mask & PSW_MASK_PSTATE) return kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu, PGM_PRIVILEGED_OP); - operand2 = kvm_s390_get_base_disp_s(vcpu); + if (fc > 3) { + vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.mask |= 3ul << 44; /* cc 3 */ + return 0; + } - if (operand2 & 0xfff && fc > 0) + if (vcpu->run->s.regs.gprs[0] & 0x0fffff00 + || vcpu->run->s.regs.gprs[1] & 0xffff0000) return kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu, PGM_SPECIFICATION); - switch (fc) { - case 0: + if (fc == 0) { vcpu->run->s.regs.gprs[0] = 3 << 28; - vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.mask &= ~(3ul << 44); + vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.mask &= ~(3ul << 44); /* cc 0 */ return 0; + } + + operand2 = kvm_s390_get_base_disp_s(vcpu); + + if (operand2 & 0xfff) + return kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu, PGM_SPECIFICATION); + + switch (fc) { case 1: /* same handling for 1 and 2 */ case 2: mem = get_zeroed_page(GFP_KERNEL); @@ -411,8 +422,6 @@ static int handle_stsi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) goto out_no_data; handle_stsi_3_2_2(vcpu, (void *) mem); break; - default: - goto out_no_data; } if (copy_to_guest_absolute(vcpu, operand2, (void *) mem, PAGE_SIZE)) {