From: Hangbin Liu Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2019 02:51:14 +0000 (+0800) Subject: vti: do not confirm neighbor when do pmtu update X-Git-Tag: v5.15~4819^2~24^2~2 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=8247a79efa2f28b44329f363272550c1738377de;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-starfive.git vti: do not confirm neighbor when do pmtu update When do IPv6 tunnel PMTU update and calls __ip6_rt_update_pmtu() in the end, we should not call dst_confirm_neigh() as there is no two-way communication. Although vti and vti6 are immune to this problem because they are IFF_NOARP interfaces, as Guillaume pointed. There is still no sense to confirm neighbour here. v5: Update commit description. v4: No change. v3: Do not remove dst_confirm_neigh, but add a new bool parameter in dst_ops.update_pmtu to control whether we should do neighbor confirm. Also split the big patch to small ones for each area. v2: Remove dst_confirm_neigh in __ip6_rt_update_pmtu. Reviewed-by: Guillaume Nault Acked-by: David Ahern Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_vti.c b/net/ipv4/ip_vti.c index 9b153c7..e90b600 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/ip_vti.c +++ b/net/ipv4/ip_vti.c @@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ static netdev_tx_t vti_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev, mtu = dst_mtu(dst); if (skb->len > mtu) { - skb_dst_update_pmtu(skb, mtu); + skb_dst_update_pmtu_no_confirm(skb, mtu); if (skb->protocol == htons(ETH_P_IP)) { icmp_send(skb, ICMP_DEST_UNREACH, ICMP_FRAG_NEEDED, htonl(mtu)); diff --git a/net/ipv6/ip6_vti.c b/net/ipv6/ip6_vti.c index 024db17..6f08b76 100644 --- a/net/ipv6/ip6_vti.c +++ b/net/ipv6/ip6_vti.c @@ -479,7 +479,7 @@ vti6_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev, struct flowi *fl) mtu = dst_mtu(dst); if (skb->len > mtu) { - skb_dst_update_pmtu(skb, mtu); + skb_dst_update_pmtu_no_confirm(skb, mtu); if (skb->protocol == htons(ETH_P_IPV6)) { if (mtu < IPV6_MIN_MTU)