From: Alan Modra Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 07:07:57 +0000 (+1030) Subject: Make powerpc bfd ld reloc overflow vs undefined symbols match gold X-Git-Tag: gdb-7.10-release~1158 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=8131c12209700f6e8cf16b09b5196da78a8066a3;p=external%2Fbinutils.git Make powerpc bfd ld reloc overflow vs undefined symbols match gold * elf64-ppc.c (ppc64_elf_relocate_section): Report overflow to stubs, even those for undefined weak symbols. Otherwise, don't report relocation overflow on branches to undefined strong symbols. Fix memory leak. * elf32-ppc.c (ppc_elf_relocate_section): Don't report relocation overflow on branches to undefined strong symbols. --- diff --git a/bfd/ChangeLog b/bfd/ChangeLog index 060db14..512452c 100644 --- a/bfd/ChangeLog +++ b/bfd/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@ +2015-03-24 Alan Modra + + * elf64-ppc.c (ppc64_elf_relocate_section): Report overflow to + stubs, even those for undefined weak symbols. Otherwise, don't + report relocation overflow on branches to undefined strong + symbols. Fix memory leak. + * elf32-ppc.c (ppc_elf_relocate_section): Don't report relocation + overflow on branches to undefined strong symbols. + 2015-03-23 Keith Seitz * elfnn-aarch64.c (_bfd_aarch64_create_or_find_stub_sec): Add diff --git a/bfd/elf32-ppc.c b/bfd/elf32-ppc.c index d61d75e..b96dbc8 100644 --- a/bfd/elf32-ppc.c +++ b/bfd/elf32-ppc.c @@ -9250,30 +9250,20 @@ ppc_elf_relocate_section (bfd *output_bfd, if (r == bfd_reloc_overflow) { overflow: - if (warned) - continue; - if (h != NULL - && h->root.type == bfd_link_hash_undefweak - && howto->pc_relative) + /* On code like "if (foo) foo();" don't report overflow + on a branch to zero when foo is undefined. */ + if (!warned + && !(h != NULL + && (h->root.type == bfd_link_hash_undefweak + || h->root.type == bfd_link_hash_undefined) + && is_branch_reloc (r_type))) { - /* Assume this is a call protected by other code that - detect the symbol is undefined. If this is the case, - we can safely ignore the overflow. If not, the - program is hosed anyway, and a little warning isn't - going to help. */ - - continue; + if (!((*info->callbacks->reloc_overflow) + (info, (h ? &h->root : NULL), sym_name, + howto->name, rel->r_addend, + input_bfd, input_section, rel->r_offset))) + return FALSE; } - - if (! (*info->callbacks->reloc_overflow) (info, - (h ? &h->root : NULL), - sym_name, - howto->name, - rel->r_addend, - input_bfd, - input_section, - rel->r_offset)) - return FALSE; } else { diff --git a/bfd/elf64-ppc.c b/bfd/elf64-ppc.c index 60f8b6e..e7e8820 100644 --- a/bfd/elf64-ppc.c +++ b/bfd/elf64-ppc.c @@ -14837,26 +14837,21 @@ ppc64_elf_relocate_section (bfd *output_bfd, if (r == bfd_reloc_overflow) { - if (warned) - continue; - if (h != NULL - && h->elf.root.type == bfd_link_hash_undefweak - && howto->pc_relative) + /* On code like "if (foo) foo();" don't report overflow + on a branch to zero when foo is undefined. */ + if (!warned + && (reloc_dest == DEST_STUB + || !(h != NULL + && (h->elf.root.type == bfd_link_hash_undefweak + || h->elf.root.type == bfd_link_hash_undefined) + && is_branch_reloc (r_type)))) { - /* Assume this is a call protected by other code that - detects the symbol is undefined. If this is the case, - we can safely ignore the overflow. If not, the - program is hosed anyway, and a little warning isn't - going to help. */ - - continue; + if (!((*info->callbacks->reloc_overflow) + (info, &h->elf.root, sym_name, + reloc_name, orig_rel.r_addend, + input_bfd, input_section, rel->r_offset))) + return FALSE; } - - if (!((*info->callbacks->reloc_overflow) - (info, &h->elf.root, sym_name, - reloc_name, orig_rel.r_addend, - input_bfd, input_section, rel->r_offset))) - return FALSE; } else {