From: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
Date: Tue, 4 May 2021 17:17:54 +0000 (+0200)
Subject: PCI: tegra: Use 'seq_puts' instead of 'seq_printf'
X-Git-Tag: accepted/tizen/unified/20230118.172025~6431^2~6^2~1
X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=804b2b6f2a95d924f52c80c80a01b8fea73efb1e;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-rpi.git

PCI: tegra: Use 'seq_puts' instead of 'seq_printf'

As spotted by checkpatch, use 'seq_puts' instead of 'seq_printf' when
possible.
It is slightly more efficient.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/7bdedb342b9221169ab085540cf25d1992e8b97a.1620148539.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr
Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com>
---

diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-tegra.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-tegra.c
index 8cc7197..099a148 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-tegra.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-tegra.c
@@ -2546,7 +2546,7 @@ static void *tegra_pcie_ports_seq_start(struct seq_file *s, loff_t *pos)
 	if (list_empty(&pcie->ports))
 		return NULL;
 
-	seq_printf(s, "Index  Status\n");
+	seq_puts(s, "Index  Status\n");
 
 	return seq_list_start(&pcie->ports, *pos);
 }
@@ -2583,16 +2583,16 @@ static int tegra_pcie_ports_seq_show(struct seq_file *s, void *v)
 	seq_printf(s, "%2u     ", port->index);
 
 	if (up)
-		seq_printf(s, "up");
+		seq_puts(s, "up");
 
 	if (active) {
 		if (up)
-			seq_printf(s, ", ");
+			seq_puts(s, ", ");
 
-		seq_printf(s, "active");
+		seq_puts(s, "active");
 	}
 
-	seq_printf(s, "\n");
+	seq_puts(s, "\n");
 	return 0;
 }