From: Jan Cybulski <j.cybulski@samsung.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2013 11:09:41 +0000 (+0200)
Subject: Added test for app_label_shared_dir on same subject as object behaviour
X-Git-Tag: security-manager_5.5_testing~432
X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=7f6811faf3c6d28770611afc9ed7d2bade83393f;p=platform%2Fcore%2Ftest%2Fsecurity-tests.git

Added test for app_label_shared_dir on same subject as object behaviour

[Issue#]   SSDWSSP-154
[Feature]  Tests for new functionalities.
[Cause]    Change in libsmack.
[Solution] Test checks what the function does when labels are equal
[Verification] Successful build. Running the tests

Change-Id: I59adbe589817172594187473d51a22fb5b2cc1d8
---

diff --git a/tests/libprivilege-control-tests/test_cases.cpp b/tests/libprivilege-control-tests/test_cases.cpp
index 656b0e4..e15f239 100644
--- a/tests/libprivilege-control-tests/test_cases.cpp
+++ b/tests/libprivilege-control-tests/test_cases.cpp
@@ -346,6 +346,9 @@ RUNNER_TEST(privilege_control02_app_label_dir)
 {
     int result;
 
+    result = app_label_shared_dir(APP_ID, APP_ID, TEST_APP_DIR);
+    RUNNER_ASSERT_MSG(result != 0, "app_label_shared_dir(APP_ADD, APP_ID) == " << result);
+
     result = nftw(TEST_APP_DIR, &nftw_remove_labels, FTW_MAX_FDS, FTW_PHYS);
     RUNNER_ASSERT_MSG(result == 0, "Unable to clean up Smack labels in " << TEST_APP_DIR);