From: Chris Wilson Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 12:58:25 +0000 (+0100) Subject: drm/i915: Allow i915_sw_fence_await_sw_fence() to allocate X-Git-Tag: v4.14-rc1~674^2~37^2~1034 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=7e941861c9c2aa69c0ef6665e2c0c1174c4a4b0e;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-rpi.git drm/i915: Allow i915_sw_fence_await_sw_fence() to allocate In forthcoming patches, we want to be able to dynamically allocate the wait_queue_t used whilst awaiting. This is more convenient if we extend the i915_sw_fence_await_sw_fence() to perform the allocation for us if we pass in a gfp mask as an alternative than a preallocated struct. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161028125858.23563-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk --- diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sw_fence.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sw_fence.c index 8185002..95f2f12 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sw_fence.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sw_fence.c @@ -13,6 +13,8 @@ #include "i915_sw_fence.h" +#define I915_SW_FENCE_FLAG_ALLOC BIT(3) /* after WQ_FLAG_* for safety */ + static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(i915_sw_fence_lock); static int __i915_sw_fence_notify(struct i915_sw_fence *fence, @@ -135,6 +137,8 @@ static int i915_sw_fence_wake(wait_queue_t *wq, unsigned mode, int flags, void * list_del(&wq->task_list); __i915_sw_fence_complete(wq->private, key); i915_sw_fence_put(wq->private); + if (wq->flags & I915_SW_FENCE_FLAG_ALLOC) + kfree(wq); return 0; } @@ -192,9 +196,9 @@ static bool i915_sw_fence_check_if_after(struct i915_sw_fence *fence, return err; } -int i915_sw_fence_await_sw_fence(struct i915_sw_fence *fence, - struct i915_sw_fence *signaler, - wait_queue_t *wq) +static int __i915_sw_fence_await_sw_fence(struct i915_sw_fence *fence, + struct i915_sw_fence *signaler, + wait_queue_t *wq, gfp_t gfp) { unsigned long flags; int pending; @@ -206,8 +210,22 @@ int i915_sw_fence_await_sw_fence(struct i915_sw_fence *fence, if (unlikely(i915_sw_fence_check_if_after(fence, signaler))) return -EINVAL; + pending = 0; + if (!wq) { + wq = kmalloc(sizeof(*wq), gfp); + if (!wq) { + if (!gfpflags_allow_blocking(gfp)) + return -ENOMEM; + + i915_sw_fence_wait(signaler); + return 0; + } + + pending |= I915_SW_FENCE_FLAG_ALLOC; + } + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&wq->task_list); - wq->flags = 0; + wq->flags = pending; wq->func = i915_sw_fence_wake; wq->private = i915_sw_fence_get(fence); @@ -226,6 +244,20 @@ int i915_sw_fence_await_sw_fence(struct i915_sw_fence *fence, return pending; } +int i915_sw_fence_await_sw_fence(struct i915_sw_fence *fence, + struct i915_sw_fence *signaler, + wait_queue_t *wq) +{ + return __i915_sw_fence_await_sw_fence(fence, signaler, wq, 0); +} + +int i915_sw_fence_await_sw_fence_gfp(struct i915_sw_fence *fence, + struct i915_sw_fence *signaler, + gfp_t gfp) +{ + return __i915_sw_fence_await_sw_fence(fence, signaler, NULL, gfp); +} + struct i915_sw_dma_fence_cb { struct dma_fence_cb base; struct i915_sw_fence *fence; diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sw_fence.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sw_fence.h index cd239e9..707dfc4 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sw_fence.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sw_fence.h @@ -46,6 +46,9 @@ void i915_sw_fence_commit(struct i915_sw_fence *fence); int i915_sw_fence_await_sw_fence(struct i915_sw_fence *fence, struct i915_sw_fence *after, wait_queue_t *wq); +int i915_sw_fence_await_sw_fence_gfp(struct i915_sw_fence *fence, + struct i915_sw_fence *after, + gfp_t gfp); int i915_sw_fence_await_dma_fence(struct i915_sw_fence *fence, struct dma_fence *dma, unsigned long timeout, @@ -62,4 +65,9 @@ static inline bool i915_sw_fence_done(const struct i915_sw_fence *fence) return atomic_read(&fence->pending) < 0; } +static inline void i915_sw_fence_wait(struct i915_sw_fence *fence) +{ + wait_event(fence->wait, i915_sw_fence_done(fence)); +} + #endif /* _I915_SW_FENCE_H_ */