From: Dan Carpenter Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 20:53:42 +0000 (+0000) Subject: bnx2x: off by one in bnx2x_ets_e3b0_sp_pri_to_cos_set() X-Git-Tag: accepted/tizen/common/20141203.182822~4782^2~9 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=7e5998aa74065d3ab31d17e667f40ffebf4b8425;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-arm64.git bnx2x: off by one in bnx2x_ets_e3b0_sp_pri_to_cos_set() The sp_pri_to_cos[] array size depends on the config but lets say it is BX_E3B0_MAX_NUM_COS_PORT0 and max_num_of_cos is also DCBX_E3B0_MAX_NUM_COS_PORT0. In the original code "pri == max_num_of_cos" was accepted but it is one past the end of the array. Also we used "pri" before capping it. It's a harmless read past the end of the array, but it would affect which error message gets printed. Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter Acked-by: Eilon Greenstein Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_link.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_link.c index ad95324..64392ec 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_link.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_link.c @@ -942,6 +942,12 @@ static int bnx2x_ets_e3b0_sp_pri_to_cos_set(const struct link_params *params, const u8 max_num_of_cos = (port) ? DCBX_E3B0_MAX_NUM_COS_PORT1 : DCBX_E3B0_MAX_NUM_COS_PORT0; + if (pri >= max_num_of_cos) { + DP(NETIF_MSG_LINK, "bnx2x_ets_e3b0_sp_pri_to_cos_set invalid " + "parameter Illegal strict priority\n"); + return -EINVAL; + } + if (sp_pri_to_cos[pri] != DCBX_INVALID_COS) { DP(NETIF_MSG_LINK, "bnx2x_ets_e3b0_sp_pri_to_cos_set invalid " "parameter There can't be two COS's with " @@ -949,12 +955,6 @@ static int bnx2x_ets_e3b0_sp_pri_to_cos_set(const struct link_params *params, return -EINVAL; } - if (pri > max_num_of_cos) { - DP(NETIF_MSG_LINK, "bnx2x_ets_e3b0_sp_pri_to_cos_set invalid " - "parameter Illegal strict priority\n"); - return -EINVAL; - } - sp_pri_to_cos[pri] = cos_entry; return 0;