From: Tim Northover <Tim.Northover@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 15:11:40 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: XFAIL test that's inappropriate for AArch64 ABI
X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=7df5c0df3b12b03f070b87d10d9787f51d2a667f;p=platform%2Fupstream%2Fllvm.git

XFAIL test that's inappropriate for AArch64 ABI

Only some ABIs require the "signext" attribute on parameters. On most
platforms, however, it's a useful test so it's best not to limit it to some
random arbitrary platform.

llvm-svn: 174619
---

diff --git a/clang/test/CodeGen/2007-06-18-SextAttrAggregate.c b/clang/test/CodeGen/2007-06-18-SextAttrAggregate.c
index 27ae6a9..f548951 100644
--- a/clang/test/CodeGen/2007-06-18-SextAttrAggregate.c
+++ b/clang/test/CodeGen/2007-06-18-SextAttrAggregate.c
@@ -1,6 +1,14 @@
 // RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -o - -emit-llvm | FileCheck %s
+// XFAIL: aarch64
+
 // PR1513
 
+// AArch64 ABI actually requires the reverse of what this is testing: the callee
+// does any extensions and remaining bits are unspecified.
+
+// Technically this test wasn't written to test that feature, but it's a
+// valuable check nevertheless.
+
 struct s{
 long a;
 long b;