From: Sujith Manoharan Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2013 15:19:55 +0000 (+0300) Subject: ath10k: Calculate correct peer PHY mode for VHT X-Git-Tag: accepted/tizen/common/20141203.182822~1141^2~225^2~25^2~22 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=7cc45e98e539ad98d8af57e4126aaac3e6b8f341;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-arm64.git ath10k: Calculate correct peer PHY mode for VHT The peer PHY mode for 11ac operation needs to be determined properly based on the channel bandwidth being used. Fix this so that the proper mode is given to the firmware. kvalo: earlier we used 11na-ht20 in STA mode for 11ac AP peer, this patch changes that to 11ac-vht80. I didn't notice any change in throughput in my tests, but nevertheless it's the right thing to do. Signed-off-by: Sujith Manoharan Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo --- diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c index 2b11856..8b9fb66 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c @@ -1080,8 +1080,6 @@ static void ath10k_peer_assoc_h_phymode(struct ath10k *ar, { enum wmi_phy_mode phymode = MODE_UNKNOWN; - /* FIXME: add VHT */ - switch (ar->hw->conf.chandef.chan->band) { case IEEE80211_BAND_2GHZ: if (sta->ht_cap.ht_supported) { @@ -1095,7 +1093,17 @@ static void ath10k_peer_assoc_h_phymode(struct ath10k *ar, break; case IEEE80211_BAND_5GHZ: - if (sta->ht_cap.ht_supported) { + /* + * Check VHT first. + */ + if (sta->vht_cap.vht_supported) { + if (sta->bandwidth == IEEE80211_STA_RX_BW_80) + phymode = MODE_11AC_VHT80; + else if (sta->bandwidth == IEEE80211_STA_RX_BW_40) + phymode = MODE_11AC_VHT40; + else if (sta->bandwidth == IEEE80211_STA_RX_BW_20) + phymode = MODE_11AC_VHT20; + } else if (sta->ht_cap.ht_supported) { if (sta->bandwidth == IEEE80211_STA_RX_BW_40) phymode = MODE_11NA_HT40; else