From: Michal Gorny Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 15:39:26 +0000 (+0000) Subject: [runtime] [test] Use more portable short options to sort(1) X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=7bbc1a782f98691be1d0f1799be675da9255c11b;p=platform%2Fupstream%2Fllvm.git [runtime] [test] Use more portable short options to sort(1) Pass `-n -s` instead of `--numeric --stable` to sort(1), as long options are not supported by NetBSD sort implementation. `-n` is defined by POSIX, so it should be fully portable. `-s` is used consistently at least in GNU sort and FreeBSD sort, and I honestly doubt it would cause issues with any other implementation supporting `--stable`. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55479 llvm-svn: 348855 --- diff --git a/openmp/runtime/test/lit.cfg b/openmp/runtime/test/lit.cfg index 9f0c059..7196d37 100644 --- a/openmp/runtime/test/lit.cfg +++ b/openmp/runtime/test/lit.cfg @@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ config.substitutions.append(("%flags", config.test_flags)) if config.has_ompt: config.substitutions.append(("FileCheck", config.test_filecheck)) - config.substitutions.append(("%sort-threads", "sort --numeric-sort --stable")) + config.substitutions.append(("%sort-threads", "sort -n -s")) if config.operating_system == 'Windows': # No such environment variable on Windows. config.substitutions.append(("%preload-tool", "true ||"))