From: Chris Wilson Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2018 19:43:09 +0000 (+0100) Subject: drm/i915: Apply batch location restrictions before pinning X-Git-Tag: v5.15~8560^2~1^2~7 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=7ba33e1c9d1e03f442b161c701d1f811ea13c75e;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-starfive.git drm/i915: Apply batch location restrictions before pinning We special case the position of the batch within the GTT to prevent negative self-relocation deltas from underflowing. However, that restriction is being applied after a trial pin of the batch in its current position. Thus we are not rejecting an invalid location if the batch has been used before, leading to an assertion if we happen to need to rearrange the entire payload. In the worst case, this may cause a GPU hang on gen7 or perhaps missing state. References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105720 Fixes: 2889caa92321 ("drm/i915: Eliminate lots of iterations over the execobjects array") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson Cc: Joonas Lahtinen Cc: Martin Peres Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180610194325.13467-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen (cherry picked from commit 746c8f143afad7aaa66c484485fc39888d437a3f) Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula --- diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c index f627a8c..22df17c 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c @@ -489,7 +489,9 @@ eb_validate_vma(struct i915_execbuffer *eb, } static int -eb_add_vma(struct i915_execbuffer *eb, unsigned int i, struct i915_vma *vma) +eb_add_vma(struct i915_execbuffer *eb, + unsigned int i, unsigned batch_idx, + struct i915_vma *vma) { struct drm_i915_gem_exec_object2 *entry = &eb->exec[i]; int err; @@ -522,6 +524,24 @@ eb_add_vma(struct i915_execbuffer *eb, unsigned int i, struct i915_vma *vma) eb->flags[i] = entry->flags; vma->exec_flags = &eb->flags[i]; + /* + * SNA is doing fancy tricks with compressing batch buffers, which leads + * to negative relocation deltas. Usually that works out ok since the + * relocate address is still positive, except when the batch is placed + * very low in the GTT. Ensure this doesn't happen. + * + * Note that actual hangs have only been observed on gen7, but for + * paranoia do it everywhere. + */ + if (i == batch_idx) { + if (!(eb->flags[i] & EXEC_OBJECT_PINNED)) + eb->flags[i] |= __EXEC_OBJECT_NEEDS_BIAS; + if (eb->reloc_cache.has_fence) + eb->flags[i] |= EXEC_OBJECT_NEEDS_FENCE; + + eb->batch = vma; + } + err = 0; if (eb_pin_vma(eb, entry, vma)) { if (entry->offset != vma->node.start) { @@ -716,7 +736,7 @@ static int eb_lookup_vmas(struct i915_execbuffer *eb) { struct radix_tree_root *handles_vma = &eb->ctx->handles_vma; struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj; - unsigned int i; + unsigned int i, batch; int err; if (unlikely(i915_gem_context_is_closed(eb->ctx))) @@ -728,6 +748,8 @@ static int eb_lookup_vmas(struct i915_execbuffer *eb) INIT_LIST_HEAD(&eb->relocs); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&eb->unbound); + batch = eb_batch_index(eb); + for (i = 0; i < eb->buffer_count; i++) { u32 handle = eb->exec[i].handle; struct i915_lut_handle *lut; @@ -770,33 +792,16 @@ static int eb_lookup_vmas(struct i915_execbuffer *eb) lut->handle = handle; add_vma: - err = eb_add_vma(eb, i, vma); + err = eb_add_vma(eb, i, batch, vma); if (unlikely(err)) goto err_vma; GEM_BUG_ON(vma != eb->vma[i]); GEM_BUG_ON(vma->exec_flags != &eb->flags[i]); + GEM_BUG_ON(drm_mm_node_allocated(&vma->node) && + eb_vma_misplaced(&eb->exec[i], vma, eb->flags[i])); } - /* take note of the batch buffer before we might reorder the lists */ - i = eb_batch_index(eb); - eb->batch = eb->vma[i]; - GEM_BUG_ON(eb->batch->exec_flags != &eb->flags[i]); - - /* - * SNA is doing fancy tricks with compressing batch buffers, which leads - * to negative relocation deltas. Usually that works out ok since the - * relocate address is still positive, except when the batch is placed - * very low in the GTT. Ensure this doesn't happen. - * - * Note that actual hangs have only been observed on gen7, but for - * paranoia do it everywhere. - */ - if (!(eb->flags[i] & EXEC_OBJECT_PINNED)) - eb->flags[i] |= __EXEC_OBJECT_NEEDS_BIAS; - if (eb->reloc_cache.has_fence) - eb->flags[i] |= EXEC_OBJECT_NEEDS_FENCE; - eb->args->flags |= __EXEC_VALIDATED; return eb_reserve(eb);