From: Frank Munzert <munzert@de.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 10:10:17 +0000 (+0100)
Subject: [S390] tape block: complete request with correct locking
X-Git-Tag: v2.6.28-rc3~92^2~5
X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=7a4a1ccd44c85c7d92b20a361e3854431c6935e0;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-stable.git

[S390] tape block: complete request with correct locking

__blk_end_request must be called with request queue lock held. We need to use
blk_end_request rather than  __blk_end_request.

Signed-off-by: Frank Munzert <munzert@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
---

diff --git a/drivers/s390/char/tape_block.c b/drivers/s390/char/tape_block.c
index 023803d..ae18baf 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/char/tape_block.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/char/tape_block.c
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ tapeblock_trigger_requeue(struct tape_device *device)
 static void
 tapeblock_end_request(struct request *req, int error)
 {
-	if (__blk_end_request(req, error, blk_rq_bytes(req)))
+	if (blk_end_request(req, error, blk_rq_bytes(req)))
 		BUG();
 }
 
@@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ tapeblock_requeue(struct work_struct *work) {
 		nr_queued++;
 	spin_unlock(get_ccwdev_lock(device->cdev));
 
-	spin_lock(&device->blk_data.request_queue_lock);
+	spin_lock_irq(&device->blk_data.request_queue_lock);
 	while (
 		!blk_queue_plugged(queue) &&
 		elv_next_request(queue)   &&
@@ -176,7 +176,9 @@ tapeblock_requeue(struct work_struct *work) {
 		if (rq_data_dir(req) == WRITE) {
 			DBF_EVENT(1, "TBLOCK: Rejecting write request\n");
 			blkdev_dequeue_request(req);
+			spin_unlock_irq(&device->blk_data.request_queue_lock);
 			tapeblock_end_request(req, -EIO);
+			spin_lock_irq(&device->blk_data.request_queue_lock);
 			continue;
 		}
 		blkdev_dequeue_request(req);