From: Luck, Tony Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 18:39:23 +0000 (-0800) Subject: ACPI: Fix section mismatch error for acpi_early_processor_set_pdc() X-Git-Tag: v2.6.33-rc5~9^2~1^2~4 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=7a0b73a49ab56fb1e836675c00d6d0d2ba39a714;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-3.10.git ACPI: Fix section mismatch error for acpi_early_processor_set_pdc() Alex Chiang introduced acpi_early_processor_set_pdc() in commit: ACPI: processor: call _PDC early 78f1699659963fff97975df44db6d5dbe7218e55 But this results in a section mismatch: WARNING: drivers/acpi/acpi.o(.text+0xa9c1): Section mismatch in reference from the function acpi_early_processor_set_pdc() to the variable .cpuinit.data:processor_idle_dmi_table The function acpi_early_processor_set_pdc() references the variable __cpuinitdata processor_idle_dmi_table. This is often because acpi_early_processor_set_pdc lacks a __cpuinitdata annotation or the annotation of processor_idle_dmi_table is wrong. The only caller of acpi_early_processor_set_pdc() is acpi_bus_init() which is an "__init" function. So the correct fix here is to mark acpi_early_processor_set_pdc() "__init" too. Signed-off-by: Tony Luck Acked-by: Alex Chiang Signed-off-by: Len Brown --- diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c index 30e4dc0..7d4ee39 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c @@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ early_init_pdc(acpi_handle handle, u32 lvl, void *context, void **rv) return AE_OK; } -void acpi_early_processor_set_pdc(void) +void __init acpi_early_processor_set_pdc(void) { /* * Check whether the system is DMI table. If yes, OSPM