From: Zhang Qilong Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2022 15:06:54 +0000 (+0800) Subject: mtd: rawnand: gpmi: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync X-Git-Tag: v6.6.7~3937^2~1^2~13 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=78e2d5410a440bc232c2f5eedb6ab0403e9675b6;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-starfive.git mtd: rawnand: gpmi: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync Using the newest pm_runtime_resume_and_get is more appropriate for simplifing code here. Signed-off-by: Zhang Qilong Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20220922150654.117568-1-zhangqilong3@huawei.com --- diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/gpmi-nand/gpmi-nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/gpmi-nand/gpmi-nand.c index 01ccbde..ada8334 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/gpmi-nand/gpmi-nand.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/gpmi-nand/gpmi-nand.c @@ -148,11 +148,9 @@ static int gpmi_init(struct gpmi_nand_data *this) struct resources *r = &this->resources; int ret; - ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(this->dev); - if (ret < 0) { - pm_runtime_put_noidle(this->dev); + ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(this->dev); + if (ret < 0) return ret; - } ret = gpmi_reset_block(r->gpmi_regs, false); if (ret) @@ -2504,11 +2502,9 @@ static int gpmi_nfc_exec_op(struct nand_chip *chip, for (i = 0; i < GPMI_MAX_TRANSFERS; i++) this->transfers[i].direction = DMA_NONE; - ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(this->dev); - if (ret < 0) { - pm_runtime_put_noidle(this->dev); + ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(this->dev); + if (ret < 0) return ret; - } /* * This driver currently supports only one NAND chip. Plus, dies share