From: Boris Brezillon Date: Fri, 11 May 2018 12:44:07 +0000 (+0200) Subject: mtd: rawnand: Do not check FAIL bit when executing a SET_FEATURES op X-Git-Tag: v4.19~848^2~1^2~1 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=782d1967d0479ffd59412b2f3179c8bb35f50ff6;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-rpi.git mtd: rawnand: Do not check FAIL bit when executing a SET_FEATURES op The ONFI spec clearly says that FAIL bit is only valid for PROGRAM, ERASE and READ-with-on-die-ECC operations, and should be ignored otherwise. It seems that checking it after sending a SET_FEATURES is a bad idea because a previous READ, PROGRAM or ERASE op may have failed, and depending on the implementation, the FAIL bit is not cleared until a new READ, PROGRAM or ERASE is started. This leads to ->set_features() returning -EIO while it actually worked, which can sometimes stop a batch of READ/PROGRAM ops. Note that we only fix the ->exec_op() path here, because some drivers are abusing the NAND_STATUS_FAIL flag in their ->waitfunc() implementation to propagate other kind of errors, like wait-ready-timeout or controller-related errors. Let's not try to fix those drivers since they worked fine so far. Fixes: 8878b126df76 ("mtd: nand: add ->exec_op() implementation") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon Acked-by: Miquel Raynal --- diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c index faf10c8..327c60b 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c @@ -2169,7 +2169,6 @@ static int nand_set_features_op(struct nand_chip *chip, u8 feature, struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_to_mtd(chip); const u8 *params = data; int i, ret; - u8 status; if (chip->exec_op) { const struct nand_sdr_timings *sdr = @@ -2183,26 +2182,18 @@ static int nand_set_features_op(struct nand_chip *chip, u8 feature, }; struct nand_operation op = NAND_OPERATION(instrs); - ret = nand_exec_op(chip, &op); - if (ret) - return ret; - - ret = nand_status_op(chip, &status); - if (ret) - return ret; - } else { - chip->cmdfunc(mtd, NAND_CMD_SET_FEATURES, feature, -1); - for (i = 0; i < ONFI_SUBFEATURE_PARAM_LEN; ++i) - chip->write_byte(mtd, params[i]); + return nand_exec_op(chip, &op); + } - ret = chip->waitfunc(mtd, chip); - if (ret < 0) - return ret; + chip->cmdfunc(mtd, NAND_CMD_SET_FEATURES, feature, -1); + for (i = 0; i < ONFI_SUBFEATURE_PARAM_LEN; ++i) + chip->write_byte(mtd, params[i]); - status = ret; - } + ret = chip->waitfunc(mtd, chip); + if (ret < 0) + return ret; - if (status & NAND_STATUS_FAIL) + if (ret & NAND_STATUS_FAIL) return -EIO; return 0;