From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2019 11:34:23 +0000 (+0100)
Subject: locking/percpu-rwsem: Extract __percpu_down_read_trylock()
X-Git-Tag: v5.10.7~2981^2~39
X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=75ff64572e497578e238fefbdff221c96f29067a;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-rpi.git

locking/percpu-rwsem: Extract __percpu_down_read_trylock()

In preparation for removing the embedded rwsem and building a custom
lock, extract the read-trylock primitive.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200131151540.098485539@infradead.org
---

diff --git a/kernel/locking/percpu-rwsem.c b/kernel/locking/percpu-rwsem.c
index becf925..b155e8e 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/percpu-rwsem.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/percpu-rwsem.c
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ void percpu_free_rwsem(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *sem)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(percpu_free_rwsem);
 
-bool __percpu_down_read(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *sem, bool try)
+static bool __percpu_down_read_trylock(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *sem)
 {
 	__this_cpu_inc(*sem->read_count);
 
@@ -73,11 +73,18 @@ bool __percpu_down_read(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *sem, bool try)
 	if (likely(!smp_load_acquire(&sem->readers_block)))
 		return true;
 
-	/*
-	 * Per the above comment; we still have preemption disabled and
-	 * will thus decrement on the same CPU as we incremented.
-	 */
-	__percpu_up_read(sem);
+	__this_cpu_dec(*sem->read_count);
+
+	/* Prod writer to re-evaluate readers_active_check() */
+	rcuwait_wake_up(&sem->writer);
+
+	return false;
+}
+
+bool __percpu_down_read(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *sem, bool try)
+{
+	if (__percpu_down_read_trylock(sem))
+		return true;
 
 	if (try)
 		return false;