From: Steven Rostedt (Google) Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2022 23:10:09 +0000 (-0400) Subject: ring-buffer: Check for NULL cpu_buffer in ring_buffer_wake_waiters() X-Git-Tag: v6.1-rc5~44^2~5 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=7433632c9ff68a991bd0bc38cabf354e9d2de410;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-starfive.git ring-buffer: Check for NULL cpu_buffer in ring_buffer_wake_waiters() On some machines the number of listed CPUs may be bigger than the actual CPUs that exist. The tracing subsystem allocates a per_cpu directory with access to the per CPU ring buffer via a cpuX file. But to save space, the ring buffer will only allocate buffers for online CPUs, even though the CPU array will be as big as the nr_cpu_ids. With the addition of waking waiters on the ring buffer when closing the file, the ring_buffer_wake_waiters() now needs to make sure that the buffer is allocated (with the irq_work allocated with it) before trying to wake waiters, as it will cause a NULL pointer dereference. While debugging this, I added a NULL check for the buffer itself (which is OK to do), and also NULL pointer checks against buffer->buffers (which is not fine, and will WARN) as well as making sure the CPU number passed in is within the nr_cpu_ids (which is also not fine if it isn't). Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/87h6zklb6n.wl-tiwai@suse.de/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAM6Wdxc0KRJMXVAA0Y=u6Jh2V=uWB-_Fn6M4xRuNppfXzL1mUg@mail.gmail.com/ Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/linux-trace-kernel/20221101191009.1e7378c8@rorschach.local.home Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Steven Noonan Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1204705 Reported-by: Takashi Iwai Reported-by: Roland Ruckerbauer Fixes: f3ddb74ad079 ("tracing: Wake up ring buffer waiters on closing of the file") Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) --- diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c index 199759c..9712083 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c +++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c @@ -937,6 +937,9 @@ void ring_buffer_wake_waiters(struct trace_buffer *buffer, int cpu) struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer; struct rb_irq_work *rbwork; + if (!buffer) + return; + if (cpu == RING_BUFFER_ALL_CPUS) { /* Wake up individual ones too. One level recursion */ @@ -945,7 +948,15 @@ void ring_buffer_wake_waiters(struct trace_buffer *buffer, int cpu) rbwork = &buffer->irq_work; } else { + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!buffer->buffers)) + return; + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)) + return; + cpu_buffer = buffer->buffers[cpu]; + /* The CPU buffer may not have been initialized yet */ + if (!cpu_buffer) + return; rbwork = &cpu_buffer->irq_work; }