From: WANG Cong Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 20:36:24 +0000 (-0700) Subject: net_sched: move tcf_lock down after gen_replace_estimator() X-Git-Tag: v4.14-rc1~743^2~4 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=74030603dfd9f76c0f279f19f1dd1ee3028fee7a;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-rpi.git net_sched: move tcf_lock down after gen_replace_estimator() Laura reported a sleep-in-atomic kernel warning inside tcf_act_police_init() which calls gen_replace_estimator() with spinlock protection. It is not necessary in this case, we already have RTNL lock here so it is enough to protect concurrent writers. For the reader, i.e. tcf_act_police(), it needs to make decision based on this rate estimator, in the worst case we drop more/less packets than necessary while changing the rate in parallel, it is still acceptable. Reported-by: Laura Abbott Reported-by: Nick Huber Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim Signed-off-by: Cong Wang Acked-by: Jamal Hadi Salim Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- diff --git a/net/sched/act_police.c b/net/sched/act_police.c index f42008b..b062bc8 100644 --- a/net/sched/act_police.c +++ b/net/sched/act_police.c @@ -132,21 +132,21 @@ static int tcf_act_police_init(struct net *net, struct nlattr *nla, } } - spin_lock_bh(&police->tcf_lock); if (est) { err = gen_replace_estimator(&police->tcf_bstats, NULL, &police->tcf_rate_est, &police->tcf_lock, NULL, est); if (err) - goto failure_unlock; + goto failure; } else if (tb[TCA_POLICE_AVRATE] && (ret == ACT_P_CREATED || !gen_estimator_active(&police->tcf_rate_est))) { err = -EINVAL; - goto failure_unlock; + goto failure; } + spin_lock_bh(&police->tcf_lock); /* No failure allowed after this point */ police->tcfp_mtu = parm->mtu; if (police->tcfp_mtu == 0) { @@ -192,8 +192,6 @@ static int tcf_act_police_init(struct net *net, struct nlattr *nla, return ret; -failure_unlock: - spin_unlock_bh(&police->tcf_lock); failure: qdisc_put_rtab(P_tab); qdisc_put_rtab(R_tab);