From: Johan Hovold Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 16:12:28 +0000 (+0100) Subject: gpio: fix sleep-while-atomic in gpiochip_remove X-Git-Tag: v3.18.4~47 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=72d8d4dd175d25cfaee6d0a585811f0ead9a9054;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-stable.git gpio: fix sleep-while-atomic in gpiochip_remove commit 6798acaa0138d8b12f1c54402ebcb66fea3deb03 upstream. Move direct and indirect calls to gpiochip_remove_pin_ranges outside of spin lock as they can end up taking a mutex in pinctrl_remove_gpio_range. Note that the pin ranges are already added outside of the lock. Fixes: 9ef0d6f7628b ("gpiolib: call pin removal in chip removal function") Fixes: f23f1516b675 ("gpiolib: provide provision to register pin ranges") Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c index 814cadff7285..c81bda0ec2cf 100644 --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c @@ -319,12 +319,10 @@ void gpiochip_remove(struct gpio_chip *chip) gpiochip_irqchip_remove(chip); acpi_gpiochip_remove(chip); - - spin_lock_irqsave(&gpio_lock, flags); - gpiochip_remove_pin_ranges(chip); of_gpiochip_remove(chip); + spin_lock_irqsave(&gpio_lock, flags); for (id = 0; id < chip->ngpio; id++) { if (test_bit(FLAG_REQUESTED, &chip->desc[id].flags)) dev_crit(chip->dev, "REMOVING GPIOCHIP WITH GPIOS STILL REQUESTED\n");