From: Pierre-Louis Bossart Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2023 21:37:47 +0000 (-0500) Subject: ASoC: Intel: atom: remove static analysis false positive X-Git-Tag: v6.6.7~1940^2^2~162^2~1 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=71d76768fbe72aa70dd61d5714a5579dc4ca61cb;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-starfive.git ASoC: Intel: atom: remove static analysis false positive make KCFLAGS='-fanalyzer' sound/soc/intel/atom/ reports a possible NULL pointer dereference. sound/soc/intel/atom/sst/sst_stream.c:221:40: error: dereference of NULL ‘block’ [CWE-476] [-Werror=analyzer-null-dereference] 221 | unsigned char *r = block->data; This is a false-positive, the GCC analyzer generated that report by considering if (bytes->block) as true in some cases and false in others. We can simplify the code and use a local variable so that static analysis does not try to look for cases where bytes->block can be modified concurrently. Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart Reviewed-by: Rander Wang Reviewed-by: Daniel Baluta Reviewed-by: Yaochun Hung Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230731213748.440285-8-pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown --- diff --git a/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst/sst_stream.c b/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst/sst_stream.c index 862a19a..288221d 100644 --- a/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst/sst_stream.c +++ b/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst/sst_stream.c @@ -173,10 +173,11 @@ int sst_send_byte_stream_mrfld(struct intel_sst_drv *sst_drv_ctx, u32 length; int pvt_id, ret = 0; struct sst_block *block = NULL; + u8 bytes_block = bytes->block; dev_dbg(sst_drv_ctx->dev, "type:%u ipc_msg:%u block:%u task_id:%u pipe: %#x length:%#x\n", - bytes->type, bytes->ipc_msg, bytes->block, bytes->task_id, + bytes->type, bytes->ipc_msg, bytes_block, bytes->task_id, bytes->pipe_id, bytes->len); if (sst_create_ipc_msg(&msg, true)) @@ -185,12 +186,12 @@ int sst_send_byte_stream_mrfld(struct intel_sst_drv *sst_drv_ctx, pvt_id = sst_assign_pvt_id(sst_drv_ctx); sst_fill_header_mrfld(&msg->mrfld_header, bytes->ipc_msg, bytes->task_id, 1, pvt_id); - msg->mrfld_header.p.header_high.part.res_rqd = bytes->block; + msg->mrfld_header.p.header_high.part.res_rqd = bytes_block; length = bytes->len; msg->mrfld_header.p.header_low_payload = length; dev_dbg(sst_drv_ctx->dev, "length is %d\n", length); memcpy(msg->mailbox_data, &bytes->bytes, bytes->len); - if (bytes->block) { + if (bytes_block) { block = sst_create_block(sst_drv_ctx, bytes->ipc_msg, pvt_id); if (block == NULL) { kfree(msg); @@ -203,7 +204,7 @@ int sst_send_byte_stream_mrfld(struct intel_sst_drv *sst_drv_ctx, dev_dbg(sst_drv_ctx->dev, "msg->mrfld_header.p.header_low_payload:%d", msg->mrfld_header.p.header_low_payload); - if (bytes->block) { + if (bytes_block) { ret = sst_wait_timeout(sst_drv_ctx, block); if (ret) { dev_err(sst_drv_ctx->dev, "fw returned err %d\n", ret); @@ -216,7 +217,7 @@ int sst_send_byte_stream_mrfld(struct intel_sst_drv *sst_drv_ctx, * copy the reply and send back * we need to update only sz and payload */ - if (bytes->block) { + if (bytes_block) { unsigned char *r = block->data; dev_dbg(sst_drv_ctx->dev, "read back %d bytes", @@ -224,7 +225,7 @@ int sst_send_byte_stream_mrfld(struct intel_sst_drv *sst_drv_ctx, memcpy(bytes->bytes, r, bytes->len); } } - if (bytes->block) + if (bytes_block) sst_free_block(sst_drv_ctx, block); out: test_and_clear_bit(pvt_id, &sst_drv_ctx->pvt_id);