From: Mike Rapoport Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 09:41:33 +0000 (+0800) Subject: memblock: ensure there is no overflow in memblock_overlaps_region() X-Git-Tag: v5.10.88~102 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=6e634c0e7155141c307958a600720bc418137554;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-rpi.git memblock: ensure there is no overflow in memblock_overlaps_region() [ Upstream commit 023accf5cdc1e504a9b04187ec23ff156fe53d90 ] There maybe an overflow in memblock_overlaps_region() if it is called with base and size such that base + size > PHYS_ADDR_MAX Make sure that memblock_overlaps_region() caps the size to prevent such overflow and remove now duplicated call to memblock_cap_size() from memblock_is_region_reserved(). Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport Tested-by: Tony Lindgren Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210630071211.21011-1-rppt@kernel.org/ Signed-off-by: Mark-PK Tsai Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c index c337df0..faa4de5 100644 --- a/mm/memblock.c +++ b/mm/memblock.c @@ -182,6 +182,8 @@ bool __init_memblock memblock_overlaps_region(struct memblock_type *type, { unsigned long i; + memblock_cap_size(base, &size); + for (i = 0; i < type->cnt; i++) if (memblock_addrs_overlap(base, size, type->regions[i].base, type->regions[i].size)) @@ -1792,7 +1794,6 @@ bool __init_memblock memblock_is_region_memory(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t siz */ bool __init_memblock memblock_is_region_reserved(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size) { - memblock_cap_size(base, &size); return memblock_overlaps_region(&memblock.reserved, base, size); }