From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2023 09:50:44 +0000 (+0200)
Subject: apparmor: Return directly after a failed kzalloc() in two functions
X-Git-Tag: v6.6.7~2400^2~7
X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=6d7467957ecdc9018fb860bb60738e997abeaecb;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-starfive.git

apparmor: Return directly after a failed kzalloc() in two functions

1. Return directly after a call of the function “kzalloc” failed
   at the beginning in these function implementations.

2. Omit extra initialisations (for a few local variables)
   which became unnecessary with this refactoring.

This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
---

diff --git a/security/apparmor/crypto.c b/security/apparmor/crypto.c
index b498ed3..6724e2f 100644
--- a/security/apparmor/crypto.c
+++ b/security/apparmor/crypto.c
@@ -28,15 +28,15 @@ unsigned int aa_hash_size(void)
 char *aa_calc_hash(void *data, size_t len)
 {
 	SHASH_DESC_ON_STACK(desc, apparmor_tfm);
-	char *hash = NULL;
-	int error = -ENOMEM;
+	char *hash;
+	int error;
 
 	if (!apparmor_tfm)
 		return NULL;
 
 	hash = kzalloc(apparmor_hash_size, GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!hash)
-		goto fail;
+		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
 
 	desc->tfm = apparmor_tfm;
 
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ int aa_calc_profile_hash(struct aa_profile *profile, u32 version, void *start,
 			 size_t len)
 {
 	SHASH_DESC_ON_STACK(desc, apparmor_tfm);
-	int error = -ENOMEM;
+	int error;
 	__le32 le32_version = cpu_to_le32(version);
 
 	if (!aa_g_hash_policy)
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ int aa_calc_profile_hash(struct aa_profile *profile, u32 version, void *start,
 
 	profile->hash = kzalloc(apparmor_hash_size, GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!profile->hash)
-		goto fail;
+		return -ENOMEM;
 
 	desc->tfm = apparmor_tfm;